| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Pixar ruby-jss gem before 1.6.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code because of the Plist gem's documented behavior of using Marshal.load during XML document processing. |
| A Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability was discovered in F-Secure Linux Security whereby the FSAVD component used in certain F-Secure products can crash while scanning larger packages/fuzzed files. The exploit can be triggered remotely by an attacker. A successful attack will result in Denial-of-Service (DoS) of the Anti-Virus engine. |
| An argument injection vulnerability in the Dragonfly gem before 1.4.0 for Ruby allows remote attackers to read and write to arbitrary files via a crafted URL when the verify_url option is disabled. This may lead to code execution. The problem occurs because the generate and process features mishandle use of the ImageMagick convert utility. |
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Shopizer before 2.17.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the ref parameter to a page about an arbitrary product, e.g., a product/insert-product-name-here.html/ref= URL. |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Shopizer before 2.17.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via customer_name in various forms of store administration. It is saved in the database. The code is executed for any user of store administration when information is fetched from the backend, e.g., in admin/customers/list.html. |
| Boa 0.94.13 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a misconfiguration involving backup.html, preview.html, js/log.js, log.html, email.html, online-users.html, and config.js. NOTE: multiple third parties report that this is a site-specific issue because those files are not part of Boa. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow condition in the action parameter, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow condition in the profile parameter which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow condition in the name parameter, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow condition in the counter parameter which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors allow unauthenticated remote access to sensitive files due to default user authentication settings. This can lead to manipulation of the device and denial of service. |
| Phoenix Contact Classic Automation Worx Software Suite in Version 1.87 and below is affected by a remote code execution vulnerability. Manipulated PC Worx or Config+ projects could lead to a remote code execution when unallocated memory is freed because of incompletely initialized data. The attacker needs to get access to an original bus configuration file (*.bcp) to be able to manipulate data inside. After manipulation the attacker needs to exchange the original file by the manipulated one on the application programming workstation. Availability, integrity, or confidentiality of an application programming workstation might be compromised by attacks using these vulnerabilities. Automated systems in operation which were programmed with one of the above-mentioned products are not affected. |
| Phoenix Contact Classic Line Controllers ILC1x0 and ILC1x1 in all versions/variants are affected by a Denial-of-Service vulnerability. The communication protocols and device access do not feature authentication measures. Remote attackers can use specially crafted IP packets to cause a denial of service on the PLC's network communication module. A successful attack stops all network communication. To restore the network connectivity the device needs to be restarted. The automation task is not affected. |
