| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Redis is an open source, in-memory database that persists on disk. In affected versions specially crafted Lua scripts executing in Redis can cause the heap-based Lua stack to be overflowed, due to incomplete checks for this condition. This can result with heap corruption and potentially remote code execution. This problem exists in all versions of Redis with Lua scripting support, starting from 2.6. The problem is fixed in versions 6.2.6, 6.0.16 and 5.0.14. For users unable to update an additional workaround to mitigate the problem without patching the redis-server executable is to prevent users from executing Lua scripts. This can be done using ACL to restrict EVAL and EVALSHA commands. |
| Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. An integer overflow bug in Redis version 6.0 or newer, could be exploited using the STRALGO LCS command to corrupt the heap and potentially result with remote code execution. This is a result of an incomplete fix by CVE-2021-29477. The problem is fixed in version 6.2.4 and 6.0.14. An additional workaround to mitigate the problem without patching the redis-server executable is to use ACL configuration to prevent clients from using the STRALGO LCS command. On 64 bit systems which have the fixes of CVE-2021-29477 (6.2.3 or 6.0.13), it is sufficient to make sure that the proto-max-bulk-len config parameter is smaller than 2GB (default is 512MB). |
| Matrix-React-SDK is a react-based SDK for inserting a Matrix chat/voip client into a web page. Before version 3.21.0, when uploading a file, the local file preview can lead to execution of scripts embedded in the uploaded file. This can only occur after several user interactions to open the preview in a separate tab. This only impacts the local user while in the process of uploading. It cannot be exploited remotely or by other users. This vulnerability is patched in version 3.21.0. |
| zzzcms zzzphp before 2.0.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by placing them in the keys parameter of a ?location=search URI, as demonstrated by an OS command within an "if" "end if" block. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918) vulnerability in FortiManager and FortiAnalyser GUI 7.0.0, 6.4.5 and below, 6.2.7 and below, 6.0.11 and below, 5.6.11 and below may allow a remote and authenticated attacker to access unauthorized files and services on the system via specifically crafted web requests. |
| An improper neutralization of input during web page generation vulnerability (CWE-79) in FortiPortal GUI 6.0.4 and below, 5.3.6 and below, 5.2.6 and below, 5.1.2 and below, 5.0.3 and below, 4.2.2 and below, 4.1.2 and below, 4.0.4 and below may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform an XSS attack via sending a crafted request with an invalid lang parameter or with an invalid org.springframework.web.servlet.i18n.CookieLocaleResolver.LOCALE value. |
| An improper neutralization of CRLF sequences in HTTP headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability In FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer GUI 7.0.0, 6.4.6 and below, 6.2.8 and below, 6.0.11 and below, 5.6.11 and below may allow an authenticated and remote attacker to perform an HTTP request splitting attack which gives attackers control of the remaining headers and body of the response. |
| Multiple improper neutralization of input during web page generation (CWE-79) in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer versions 7.0.0, 6.4.5 and below, 6.2.7 and below user interface, may allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform a Stored Cross Site Scripting attack (XSS) by injecting malicious payload in GET parameters. |
| A use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm vulnerability [CWE-327] in the Dynamic Tunnel Protocol of FortiWAN before 4.5.9 may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to decrypt and forge protocol communication messages. |
| A use of hard-coded credentials (CWE-798) vulnerability in FortiPortal versions 5.2.5 and below, 5.3.5 and below, 6.0.4 and below, versions 5.1.x and 5.0.x may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands as root by uploading and deploying malicious web application archive files using the default hard-coded Tomcat Manager username and password. |
| An improper access control vulnerability in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer GUI interface 7.0.0, 6.4.5 and below, 6.2.8 and below, 6.0.11 and below, 5.6.11 and below may allow a remote and authenticated attacker with restricted user profile to retrieve the list of administrative users of other ADOMs and their related configuration. |
| Missing input validation in internal/db/repo_editor.go in Gogs before 0.12.8 allows an attacker to execute code remotely. An unprivileged attacker (registered user) can overwrite the Git configuration in his repository. This leads to Remote Command Execution, because that configuration can contain an option such as sshCommand, which is executed when a master branch is a remote branch (using an ssh:// URI). The remote branch can also be configured by editing the Git configuration file. One can create a new file in a new repository, using the GUI, with "\" as its name, and then rename this file to .git/config with the custom configuration content (and then save it). |
| Pexip Infinity before 26 allows remote denial of service because of missing RTMP input validation. |
| Special characters of IGT search function in igt+ are not filtered in specific fields, which allow remote authenticated attackers can inject malicious JavaScript and carry out DOM-based XSS (Cross-site scripting) attacks. |
| The CTS Web transaction system related to authentication management is implemented incorrectly. After login, remote attackers can manipulate cookies to access other accounts and trade in the stock market with spoofed identity. |
| The parameters of the specific functions in the CTS Web trading system do not filter special characters, which allows unauthenticated attackers can remotely perform reflected XSS and obtain the users’ connection token that triggered the attack. |
| The CTS Web transaction system related to authentication and session management is implemented incorrectly, which allows remote unauthenticated attackers can send a large number of valid usernames, and force those logged-in account to log out, causing the user to be unable to access the services |
| Add event in calendar function in the 101EIP system does not filter special characters in specific fields, which allows remote authenticated users to inject JavaScript and perform a stored XSS attack. |
| ARTWARE CMS parameter of image upload function does not filter the type of upload files which allows remote attackers can upload arbitrary files without logging in, and further execute code unrestrictedly. |
| The login page in the MCUsystem does not filter with special characters, which allows remote attackers can inject JavaScript without privilege and thus perform reflected XSS attacks. |
