Search
Search Results (118507 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-0671 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| Format string vulnerability in the University of Washington (UW) c-client library, as used by the UW IMAP toolkit imap-2007d and other applications, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the initial request to the IMAP port (143/tcp). NOTE: Red Hat has disputed the vulnerability, stating "The Red Hat Security Response Team have been unable to confirm the existence of this format string vulnerability in the toolkit, and the sample published exploit is not complete or functional." CVE agrees that the exploit contains syntax errors and uses Unix-only include files while invoking Windows functions | ||||
| CVE-2009-0242 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| gmetad in Ganglia 3.1.1, when supporting multiple requests per connection on an interactive port, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a request to the gmetad service with a path that does not exist, which causes Ganglia to (1) perform excessive CPU computation and (2) send the entire tree, which consumes network bandwidth. NOTE: the vendor and original researcher have disputed this issue, since legitimate requests can generate the same amount of resource consumption. CVE concurs with the dispute, so this identifier should not be used | ||||
| CVE-2008-6049 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in TinyMCE 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the menuID parameter. NOTE: CVE and multiple reliable third parties dispute this issue, since TinyMCE does not contain index.php or any PHP code. This may be an issue in a product that has integrated TinyMCE | ||||
| CVE-2008-5850 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate was originally recorded for a "SPLAT Remote Root Exploit" that was claimed to exist for Check Point SmartCenter. The claim has no actionable details and was disclosed by a person of unknown reliability who did not coordinate with the vendor. No people of known reliability have confirmed the original claim. The vendor has not indicated that they are aware of any vulnerability. Since the claim has no actionable details or independent verification, it is outside the scope of CVE according to current inclusion criteria | ||||
| CVE-2006-6967 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). In addition, it describes standard behavior (publication of revocation lists) and as such does not cross privilege boundaries. Notes: the former description is: "Check Point FireWall-1 allows remote attackers to obtain certificate revocation lists (CRLs) and other unspecified sensitive information via an HTTP request for the top-level URI on the internal certificate authority (ICA) port (18264/tcp). | ||||
| CVE-2005-1032 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| cart.php in LiteCommerce might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via invalid (1) category_id or (2) product_id parameters. NOTE: this issue was originally claimed to be due to SQL injection, but the original researcher is known to be frequently inaccurate with respect to bug type and severity. The vendor has disputed this issue, saying "These reports are credited to malicious person we refused to hire. We have not taken legal action against him only because he is located in India. The vulnerabilites reported can not be reproduced, hence information you provide is contrary to fact." Further investigation by CVE personnel shows that an invalid SQL syntax error could be generated, but it only reveals portions of underlying database structure, which is already available in documentation from the vendor, and it does not appear to lead to path disclosure. Therefore, this issue is not a vulnerability or an exposure, and it probably should be REJECTED | ||||
| CVE-2023-33426 | 2023-05-24 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Apache RocketMQ where, under certain conditions, there is a risk of remote command execution. Several components of RocketMQ, including NameServer, Broker, and Controller, are leaked on the extranet and lack permission verification. This flaw allows an attacker to use the update configuration function to execute commands as the system users that RocketMQ is running as. | ||||