| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| libjxl b02d6b9, as used in libvips 8.11 through 8.11.2 and other products, has an out-of-bounds write in jxl::ModularFrameDecoder::DecodeGroup (called from jxl::FrameDecoder::ProcessACGroup and jxl::ThreadPool::RunCallState<jxl::FrameDecoder::ProcessSections). |
| MDB Tools (aka mdbtools) 0.9.2 has a stack-based buffer overflow (at 0x7ffd6e029ee0) in mdb_numeric_to_string (called from mdb_xfer_bound_data and _mdb_attempt_bind). |
| MDB Tools (aka mdbtools) 0.9.2 has a stack-based buffer overflow (at 0x7ffd0c689be0) in mdb_numeric_to_string (called from mdb_xfer_bound_data and _mdb_attempt_bind). |
| Studio 42 elFinder through 2.1.31 allows XSS via an SVG document. |
| NHI’s health insurance web service component has insufficient validation for input string length, which can result in heap-based buffer overflow attack. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to flood the memory space reserved for the program, in order to terminate service without authentication, which requires a system restart to recover service. |
| The server-request receiver function of Shockwall system has an improper authentication vulnerability. An authenticated attacker of an agent computer within the local area network can use the local registry information to launch server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on another agent computer, resulting in arbitrary code execution for controlling the system or disrupting service. |
| The programming function of Shockwall system has an improper input validation vulnerability. An authenticated attacker within the local area network can send malicious response to the server to disrupt the service partially. |
| In LuxSoft LuxCal Web Calendar before 5.2.0, an unauthenticated attacker can manipulate a cookie value. This allows the attacker's session to be authenticated as any registered LuxCal user, including the site administrator. |
| In LuxSoft LuxCal Web Calendar before 5.2.0, an unauthenticated attacker can manipulate a POST request. This allows the attacker's session to be authenticated as any registered LuxCal user, including the site administrator. |
| A hardcoded key in ControlUp Real-Time Agent (cuAgent.exe) before 8.2.5 may allow a potential attacker to run OS commands via a WCF channel. |
| An unauthenticated Named Pipe channel in Controlup Real-Time Agent (cuAgent.exe) before 8.5 potentially allows an attacker to run OS commands via the ProcessActionRequest WCF method. |
| An issue was discovered in gif2apng 1.9. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in the main function. It allows an attacker to write 2 bytes outside the boundaries of the buffer. |
| An issue was discovered in gif2apng 1.9. There is a heap-based buffer overflow within the main function. It allows an attacker to write data outside of the allocated buffer. The attacker has control over a part of the address that data is written to, control over the written data, and (to some extent) control over the amount of data that is written. |
| An issue was discovered in gif2apng 1.9. There is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the DecodeLZW function. It allows an attacker to write a large amount of arbitrary data outside the boundaries of a buffer. |
| An issue was discovered in gif2apng 1.9. There is a stack-based buffer overflow involving a while loop. An attacker has little influence over the data written to the stack, making it unlikely that the flow of control can be subverted. |
| An issue was discovered in gif2apng 1.9. There is a stack-based buffer overflow involving a for loop. An attacker has little influence over the data written to the stack, making it unlikely that the flow of control can be subverted. |
| OpenWrt 21.02.1 allows XSS via the NAT Rules Name screen. |
| OpenWrt 21.02.1 allows XSS via the Traffic Rules Name screen. |
| OpenWrt 21.02.1 allows XSS via the Port Forwards Add Name screen. |
| A persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) issue in the web interface of SuiteCRM before 7.10.35, and 7.11.x and 7.12.x before 7.12.2, allows a remote attacker to introduce arbitrary JavaScript via attachments upload, a different vulnerability than CVE-2021-39267 and CVE-2021-39268. |
