| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in news.php in Dimofinf CMS Version 3.0.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the id parameter. |
| tinyexr 0.9.5 has a memory leak in ParseEXRHeaderFromMemory in tinyexr.h. |
| tinyexr 0.9.5 has a heap-based buffer over-read in tinyexr::DecodePixelData in tinyexr.h, related to OpenEXR code. |
| There is unauthenticated reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) in LAMS before 3.1 that allows a remote attacker to introduce arbitrary JavaScript via manipulation of an unsanitized GET parameter during a forgotPasswordChange.jsp?key= password change. |
| In Octopus Deploy version 2018.5.1 to 2018.5.7, a user with Task View is able to view a password for a Service Fabric Cluster, when the Service Fabric Cluster target is configured in Azure Active Directory security mode and a deployment is executed with OctopusPrintVariables set to True. This is fixed in 2018.6.0. |
| S3QL before 2.27 mishandles checksumming, and consequently allows replay attacks in which an attacker who controls the backend can present old versions of the filesystem metadata database as up-to-date, temporarily inject zero-valued bytes into files, or temporarily hide parts of files. This is related to the checksum_basic_mapping function. |
| Failure to validate certificates in OPC Foundation UA Client Applications communicating without security allows attackers with control over a piece of network infrastructure to decrypt passwords. |
| Buffer overflow in OPC UA applications allows remote attackers to trigger a stack overflow with carefully structured requests. |
| Liblouis 3.6.0 has a stack-based Buffer Overflow in the function parseChars in compileTranslationTable.c, a different vulnerability than CVE-2018-11440. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitAsean (BAS), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GOAL Bonanza (GOAL), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto (NTO), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin (TGT), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token (INT), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum (SUB), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PolyAI (AI), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
| A vulnerability in the UPC bar code of the Avanti Markets MarketCard could allow an unauthenticated, local attacker to access funds within the customer's MarketCard balance, and also could lead to Customer Information Disclosure. The vulnerability is due to lack of proper validation of the UPC bar code present on the MarketCard. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by generating a copy of a customer's bar code. An exploit could allow the attacker to access all funds located within the MarketCard or allow unauthenticated disclosure of information. |
| An issue was discovered on Eminent EM4544 9.10 devices. The device does not require the user's current password to set a new one within the web interface. Therefore, it is possible to exploit this issue (e.g., in combination with a successful XSS, or at an unattended workstation) to change the admin password to an attacker-chosen value without knowing the current password. |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Media Popcorn A-200 03-05-130708-21-POP-411-000 firmware. It is configured to provide TELNET remote access (without a password) that pops a shell as root. If an attacker can connect to port 23 on the device, he can completely compromise it. |
| The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SEC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
