Total
275052 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2003-0798 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0790 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: the reported issue is not a vulnerability or exposure. Notes: This candidate was assigned to a "head-reading" bug in a component of fetchmail 6.2.4 and earlier, which was claimed to allow a denial of service. However, the bug is in a broken component of fetchmail that is not "reachable" by any execution path, so it cannot be triggered by any sort of attack and is not exploitable | ||||
| CVE-2003-0741 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0698 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0743. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0743. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0743 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2003-0687 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate has been revoked by its Candidate Numbering Authority (CNA) because it was internally assigned to a problem that was not reachable (the affected routine was not used by the software). Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0684 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0678 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0598 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0657. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0657. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0657 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2003-0591 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate number that was created during the refinement phase. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2003-0582 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0504. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0504. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0504 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2003-0571 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0570 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0569 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0568 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0439 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0351 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0306. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0306. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0306 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2003-0200 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0199 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2003-0158 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0139. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0139 due to incomplete coordination. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0139 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2003-0157 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0138. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0138 due to incomplete coordination. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0138 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||