DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-3497, CVE-2012-6400. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-3497 and CVE-2012-6400. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-3497 (an issue in Xen) or CVE-2012-6400 (an issue not in Xen) instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

Deserialization of untrusted data can occur in versions 23.10.2.0 and newer of the MindsDB platform, enabling a maliciously uploaded ‘inhouse’ model to run arbitrary code on the server when using ‘finetune’ on it.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4812. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-4812. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4812 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

Deserialization of untrusted data can occur in versions 23.10.3.0 and newer of the MindsDB platform, enabling a maliciously uploaded ‘inhouse’ model to run arbitrary code on the server when a ‘describe’ query is run on it.

Deserialization of untrusted data can occur in versions 23.10.2.0 and newer of the MindsDB platform, enabling a maliciously uploaded ‘inhouse’ model to run arbitrary code on the server when used for a prediction.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2360, CVE-2008-2361, CVE-2008-2362. Reason: This candidate has been withdrawn by its CNA. It was SPLIT into separate candidates before publication. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2360, CVE-2008-2361, and CVE-2008-2362 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

Deserialization of untrusted data can occur in versions 23.3.2.0 and newer of the MindsDB platform, enabling a maliciously uploaded model to run arbitrary code on the server when interacted with.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none

icedtea-web: issue not fixed in 1.4

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-4540. Reason: This candidate was MERGED into CVE-2012-4540, since it was later discovered that it affected an additional version, but it does not constitute a regression error. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-4540 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-2621. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2010-2621. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-2621 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

Adobe Indesign TIF File Parsing Out Of Bound Read

InDesign Desktop versions ID19.4, ID18.5.2 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass mitigations such as ASLR. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-14976. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-14976. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-14976 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9866. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9866. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9866 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-12230. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-12230. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-12230 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9849. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9849. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9849 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1290. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-1290. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1290 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage