| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager versions 3.x before 3.12.0 has XSS in multiple areas in the Administration UI. |
| Grafana before 5.2.0-beta1 has XSS vulnerabilities in dashboard links. |
| The liblnk_data_block_read function in liblnk_data_block.c in liblnk through 2018-04-19 allows remote attackers to cause an information disclosure (heap-based buffer over-read) via a crafted lnk file. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this as described in libyal/liblnk issue 33 on GitHub |
| The liblnk_location_information_read_data function in liblnk_location_information.c in liblnk through 2018-04-19 allows remote attackers to cause an information disclosure (heap-based buffer over-read) via a crafted lnk file. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this as described in libyal/liblnk issue 33 on GitHub |
| The liblnk_data_string_get_utf8_string_size function in liblnk_data_string.c in liblnk through 2018-04-19 allows remote attackers to cause an information disclosure (heap-based buffer over-read) via a crafted lnk file. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this as described in libyal/liblnk issue 33 on GitHub |
| A Reflected Cross-Site Scripting web vulnerability has been discovered in the OEcms v3.1 web-application. The vulnerability is located in the mod parameter of info.php. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in news.php in Dimofinf CMS Version 3.0.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the id parameter. |
| tinyexr 0.9.5 has a memory leak in ParseEXRHeaderFromMemory in tinyexr.h. |
| tinyexr 0.9.5 has a heap-based buffer over-read in tinyexr::DecodePixelData in tinyexr.h, related to OpenEXR code. |
| There is unauthenticated reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) in LAMS before 3.1 that allows a remote attacker to introduce arbitrary JavaScript via manipulation of an unsanitized GET parameter during a forgotPasswordChange.jsp?key= password change. |
| In Octopus Deploy version 2018.5.1 to 2018.5.7, a user with Task View is able to view a password for a Service Fabric Cluster, when the Service Fabric Cluster target is configured in Azure Active Directory security mode and a deployment is executed with OctopusPrintVariables set to True. This is fixed in 2018.6.0. |
| S3QL before 2.27 mishandles checksumming, and consequently allows replay attacks in which an attacker who controls the backend can present old versions of the filesystem metadata database as up-to-date, temporarily inject zero-valued bytes into files, or temporarily hide parts of files. This is related to the checksum_basic_mapping function. |
| Failure to validate certificates in OPC Foundation UA Client Applications communicating without security allows attackers with control over a piece of network infrastructure to decrypt passwords. |
| Buffer overflow in OPC UA applications allows remote attackers to trigger a stack overflow with carefully structured requests. |
| Liblouis 3.6.0 has a stack-based Buffer Overflow in the function parseChars in compileTranslationTable.c, a different vulnerability than CVE-2018-11440. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitAsean (BAS), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GOAL Bonanza (GOAL), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto (NTO), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin (TGT), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
| The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token (INT), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue. |
