The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE.
Search vulnerabilities
samba: Validated dnsHostname write right needs to be implemented
Samba does not validate the Validated-DNS-Host-Name right for the dNSHostName attribute which could permit unprivileged users to write it.
Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Sprecher Automation SPRECON-E
Improper Privilege Management in Sprecher Automation SPRECON-E below version 8.71j allows a remote attacker with low privileges to save unauthorized protection assignments.
ZKTeco ZKBio Access IVS Department Name Search Bar cross site scripting
A vulnerability was determined in ZKTeco ZKBio Access IVS up to 3.3.2. This impacts an unknown function of the component Department Name Search Bar. This manipulation with the input <marquee>hi causes cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor explains: "ZKBio Access IVS is no longer maintained and the product has been replaced by ZKBio CVAccess, it is recommended to replace it with the latest version of ZKBio CVAccess." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Phoenix Contact: Access to CSRF tokens of higher privileged users in MGUARD products
A low privileged remote attacker can get access to CSRF tokens of higher privileged users which can be abused to mount CSRF attacks.
Pepperl+Fuchs: Incorrectly configured FTP-Server in OIT Products
An unauthenticated remote attacker can read out sensitive device information through a incorrectly configured FTP service.
Phoenix Contact: Configuration changes of the firewall services can lead to DoS in MGUARD devices
A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet filter, packet forwarding, network access control or NAT through the FW_INCOMING.FROM_IP FW_INCOMING.IN_IP FW_OUTGOING.FROM_IP FW_OUTGOING.IN_IP FW_RULESETS.FROM_IP FW_RULESETS.IN_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS.
Phoenix Contact: Firewall reconfiguration through the FW_environment variables in MGUARD devices
A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet filter, packet forwarding, network access control or NAT through the FW_INCOMING.FROM_IP FW_INCOMING.IN_IP FW_OUTGOING.FROM_IP FW_OUTGOING.IN_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS.
Phoenix Contact: Firewall reconfiguration through the FW_PORTFORWARDING.SRC_IP in MGUARD devices
A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet filter, packet forwarding, network access control or NAT through the FW_PORTFORWARDING.SRC_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS.
Phoenix Contact: Firewall reconfiguration due to improper input validation in MGUARD devices
A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet forwarding or NAT through the FW_NAT.IN_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS.
Phoenix Contact: OSPF reconfiguration due to improper input validation in MGUARD devices
A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the ospf service through OSPF_INTERFACE.SIMPLE_KEY, OSPF_INTERFACE.DIGEST_KEY environment variables which can lead to a DoS.
Phoenix Contact: SNMP reconfiguration due to improper input validation in MGUARD devices
A low privileged remote attacker with write permissions can reconfigure the SNMP service due to improper input validation.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the content page editor in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.103, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92 and 7.3 update 29 through update 35 allows remote attackers to (1) change user passwords, (2) shut down the server, (3) execute arbitrary code in the scripting console, (4) and perform other administrative actions via the _com_liferay_commerce_catalog_web_internal_portlet_CommerceCatalogsPortlet_redirect parameter.
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
Nautobot vulnerable to secrets exposure and data manipulation through Jinja2 templating
Nautobot is a Network Source of Truth and Network Automation Platform. All users of Nautobot versions prior to 2.4.10 or prior to 1.6.32 are potentially affected. Due to insufficient security configuration of the Jinja2 templating feature used in computed fields, custom links, etc. in Nautobot, a malicious user could configure this feature set in ways that could expose the value of Secrets defined in Nautobot when the templated content is rendered or that could call Python APIs to modify data within Nautobot when the templated content is rendered, bypassing the object permissions assigned to the viewing user. Nautobot versions 1.6.32 and 2.4.10 will include fixes for the vulnerability. The vulnerability can be partially mitigated by configuring object permissions appropriately to limit certain actions to only trusted users.
Nautobot may allows uploaded media files to be accessible without authentication
Nautobot is a Network Source of Truth and Network Automation Platform. Prior to v2.4.10 and v1.6.32 , files uploaded by users to Nautobot's MEDIA_ROOT directory, including DeviceType image attachments as well as images attached to a Location, Device, or Rack, are served to users via a URL endpoint that was not enforcing user authentication. As a consequence, such files can be retrieved by anonymous users who know or can guess the correct URL for a given file. Nautobot v2.4.10 and v1.6.32 address this issue by adding enforcement of Nautobot user authentication to this endpoint.
Tuleap has missing CSRF protections on artifact submission & edition from the tracker view
Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap has missing CSRF protections on artifact submission & edition from the tracker view. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into submitting or editing artifacts or follow-up comments. The vulnerability is fixed in Tuleap Community Edition 16.5.99.1741784483 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.5-3 and 16.4-8.
Tuleap is missing CSRF protection on tracker hierarchy administration
Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap is missing CSRF protection on tracker hierarchy administration. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into submitting or editing artifacts or follow-up comments. This vulnerability is fixed in Tuleap Community Edition 16.5.99.1742306712 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.5-5 and 16.4-8.