| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Early versions of Operator-SDK provided an insecure method to allow operator containers to run in environments that used a random UID. Operator-SDK before 0.15.2 provided a script, user_setup, which modifies the permissions of the /etc/passwd file to 664 during build time. Developers who used Operator-SDK before 0.15.2 to scaffold their operator may still be impacted by this if the insecure user_setup script is still being used to build new container images.
In affected images, the /etc/passwd file is created during build time with group-writable permissions and a group ownership of root (gid=0). An attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, may be able to leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This could allow the attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, leading to full root privileges within the container. |
| A flaw was found in OpenSSL's handling of the properties argument in certain functions. This vulnerability can allow use-after-free exploitation, which may result in undefined behavior or incorrect property parsing, leading to OpenSSL treating the input as an empty string. |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| The Qi Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access due to a missing capability check on the `resize_image_callback()` function in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.3. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user has permission to resize a specific attachment. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to resize arbitrary media library images belonging to other users, which can result in unintended file writes, disk consumption, and server resource abuse through processing of large images. |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| A relative path traversal vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 may allow an attacker to execute administrative commands on the system via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests. |
| The vulnerability, if exploited, could allow a miscreant with read
access to Edge Project files or Edge Offline Cache files to reverse
engineer Edge users' app-native or Active Directory passwords through
computational brute-forcing of weak hashes. |
| The vulnerability, if exploited, could allow an authenticated miscreant
(with privilege of "aaConfigTools") to tamper with App Objects' help
files and persist a cross-site scripting (XSS) injection that when
executed by a victim user, can result in horizontal or vertical
escalation of privileges. The vulnerability can only be exploited during
config-time operations within the IDE component of Application Server.
Run-time components and operations are not affected. |
| Brightpick Mission Control
discloses device telemetry, configuration, and credential information
via WebSocket traffic to unauthenticated users when they connect to a
specific URL. The unauthenticated URL can be discovered through basic
network scanning techniques. |
| The Brightpick Mission Control web application exposes hardcoded credentials in its client-side JavaScript bundle. |
| The Brightpick Internal Logic Control web interface is accessible
without requiring user authentication. An unauthorized user could
exploit this interface to manipulate robot control functions, including
initiating or halting runners, assigning jobs, clearing stations, and
deploying storage totes. |
| General Industrial Controls Lynx+ Gateway is vulnerable to a cleartext transmission vulnerability that could allow
an attacker to observe network traffic to obtain sensitive information,
including plaintext credentials. |
