CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
Opening links via the contextual menu in Focus iOS for certain URL schemes would fail to load but would not refresh the toolbar correctly, allowing attackers to spoof websites if users were coerced into opening a link explicitly through a long-press This vulnerability affects Focus for iOS < 143.0. |
This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143. |
This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143. |
This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143. |
This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143. |
Memory safety bugs present in Firefox ESR 140.2, Thunderbird ESR 140.2, Firefox 142 and Thunderbird 142. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143 and Firefox ESR < 140.3. |
This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143 and Firefox ESR < 140.3. |
This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143 and Firefox ESR < 140.3. |
This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143 and Firefox ESR < 140.3. |
This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143 and Firefox ESR < 140.3. |
This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143 and Firefox ESR < 140.3. |
This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143, Firefox ESR < 115.28, and Firefox ESR < 140.3. |
Memory corruptions can be remotely triggered in the Control-M/Agent when SSL/TLS communication is configured.
The issue occurs in the following cases:
* Control-M/Agent 9.0.20: SSL/TLS configuration is set to the non-default setting "use_openssl=n";
* Control-M/Agent 9.0.21 and 9.0.22: Agent router configuration uses the non-default settings "JAVA_AR=N" and "use_openssl=n". |
A stack-based buffer overflow can be remotely triggered when formatting an error message in the Control-M/Agent when SSL/TLS communication is configured.
The issue occurs in the following cases:
* Control-M/Agent 9.0.20: SSL/TLS configuration is set to the non-default setting "use_openssl=n";
* Control-M/Agent 9.0.21 and 9.0.22: Agent router configuration uses the non-default settings "JAVA_AR=N" and "use_openssl=n". |
A buffer overflow in the Control-M/Agent can lead to a local privilege escalation when an attacker has access to the system running the Agent.
This vulnerability impacts the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions. |
A path traversal in the Control-M/Agent can lead to a local privilege escalation when an attacker has access to the system running the Agent. This vulnerability impacts the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions. This vulnerability was fixed in 9.0.20.100 and above. |
The improper order of AUTHORIZED_CTM_IP validation in the Control-M/Agent, where the Control-M/Server IP address is validated only after the SSL/TLS handshake is completed, exposes the Control-M/Agent to vulnerabilities in the SSL/TLS implementation under certain non-default conditions (e.g. CVE-2025-55117 or CVE-2025-55118) or potentially to resource exhaustion. |
If the Access Control List is enforced by the Control-M/Agent and the C router is in use (default in Out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions; non-default but configurable using the JAVA_AR setting in newer versions), the verification stops at the first NULL byte encountered in the email address referenced in the client certificate. An attacker could bypass configured ACLs by using a specially crafted certificate. |
Out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 (and potentially earlier unsupported versions) that are configured to use the non-default Blowfish cryptography algorithm use a hardcoded key. An attacker with access to network traffic and to this key could decrypt network traffic between the Control-M/Agent and Server. |
This vulnerability exist in PPC 2K15X Router, due to improper input validation for the Common Gateway Interface (CGI) parameters at its web management portal. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious JavaScript into the vulnerable parameter, leading to a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack on the targeted system. |