Filtered by vendor Oisf
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Suricata
Subscriptions
Total
25 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-38536 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. A memory allocation failure due to `http.memcap` being reached leads to a NULL-ptr reference leading to a crash. Upgrade to 7.0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38535 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Suricata can run out of memory when parsing crafted HTTP/2 traffic. Upgrade to 6.0.20 or 7.0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38534 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Crafted modbus traffic can lead to unlimited resource accumulation within a flow. Upgrade to 7.0.6. Set a limited stream.reassembly.depth to reduce the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37151 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Mishandling of multiple fragmented packets using the same IP ID value can lead to packet reassembly failure, which can lead to policy bypass. Upgrade to 7.0.6 or 6.0.20. When using af-packet, enable `defrag` to reduce the scope of the problem. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32867 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.5 and 6.0.19, various problems in handling of fragmentation anomalies can lead to mis-detection of rules and policy. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.0.5 or 6.0.19. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32664 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.5 and 6.0.19, specially crafted traffic or datasets can cause a limited buffer overflow. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.0.5 and 6.0.19. Workarounds include not use rules with `base64_decode` keyword with `bytes` option with value 1, 2 or 5 and for 7.0.x, setting `app-layer.protocols.smtp.mime.body-md5` to false. | ||||
| CVE-2023-35853 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Suricata before 6.0.13, an adversary who controls an external source of Lua rules may be able to execute Lua code. This is addressed in 6.0.13 by disabling Lua unless allow-rules is true in the security lua configuration section. | ||||
| CVE-2023-35852 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| In Suricata before 6.0.13 (when there is an adversary who controls an external source of rules), a dataset filename, that comes from a rule, may trigger absolute or relative directory traversal, and lead to write access to a local filesystem. This is addressed in 6.0.13 by requiring allow-absolute-filenames and allow-write (in the datasets rules configuration section) if an installation requires traversal/writing in this situation. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45098 | 2 Debian, Oisf | 2 Debian Linux, Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Suricata before 6.0.4. It is possible to bypass/evade any HTTP-based signature by faking an RST TCP packet with random TCP options of the md5header from the client side. After the three-way handshake, it's possible to inject an RST ACK with a random TCP md5header option. Then, the client can send an HTTP GET request with a forbidden URL. The server will ignore the RST ACK and send the response HTTP packet for the client's request. These packets will not trigger a Suricata reject action. | ||||
| CVE-2021-37592 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Suricata before 5.0.8 and 6.x before 6.0.4 allows TCP evasion via a client with a crafted TCP/IP stack that can send a certain sequence of segments. | ||||
| CVE-2021-35063 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Oisf | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Suricata before 5.0.7 and 6.x before 6.0.3 has a "critical evasion." | ||||
| CVE-2020-19678 | 2 Oisf, Pfsense | 3 Suricata, Pfsense, Suricata Package | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Directory Traversal vulnerability found in Pfsense v.2.1.3 and Pfsense Suricata v.1.4.6 pkg v.1.0.1 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the file parameter to suricata/suricata_logs_browser.php. | ||||
| CVE-2019-18792 | 2 Debian, Oisf | 2 Debian Linux, Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Suricata 5.0.0. It is possible to bypass/evade any tcp based signature by overlapping a TCP segment with a fake FIN packet. The fake FIN packet is injected just before the PUSH ACK packet we want to bypass. The PUSH ACK packet (containing the data) will be ignored by Suricata because it overlaps the FIN packet (the sequence and ack number are identical in the two packets). The client will ignore the fake FIN packet because the ACK flag is not set. Both linux and windows clients are ignoring the injected packet. | ||||
| CVE-2019-18625 | 4 Debian, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel, Windows and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Suricata 5.0.0. It was possible to bypass/evade any tcp based signature by faking a closed TCP session using an evil server. After the TCP SYN packet, it is possible to inject a RST ACK and a FIN ACK packet with a bad TCP Timestamp option. The client will ignore the RST ACK and the FIN ACK packets because of the bad TCP Timestamp option. Both linux and windows client are ignoring the injected packets. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10050 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer over-read issue was discovered in Suricata 4.1.x before 4.1.4. If the input of the decode-mpls.c function DecodeMPLS is composed only of a packet of source address and destination address plus the correct type field and the right number for shim, an attacker can manipulate the control flow, such that the condition to leave the loop is true. After leaving the loop, the network packet has a length of 2 bytes. There is no validation of this length. Later on, the code tries to read at an empty position, leading to a crash. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1010279 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Open Information Security Foundation Suricata prior to version 4.1.3 is affected by: Denial of Service - TCP/HTTP detection bypass. The impact is: An attacker can evade a signature detection with a specialy formed sequence of network packets. The component is: detect.c (https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/3625/commits/d8634daf74c882356659addb65fb142b738a186b). The attack vector is: An attacker can trigger the vulnerability by a specifically crafted network TCP session. The fixed version is: 4.1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1010251 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Open Information Security Foundation Suricata prior to version 4.1.2 is affected by: Denial of Service - DNS detection bypass. The impact is: An attacker can evade a signature detection with a specialy formed network packet. The component is: app-layer-detect-proto.c, decode.c, decode-teredo.c and decode-ipv6.c (https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/3590/commits/11f3659f64a4e42e90cb3c09fcef66894205aefe, https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/3590/commits/8357ef3f8ffc7d99ef6571350724160de356158b). The attack vector is: An attacker can trigger the vulnerability by sending a specifically crafted network request. The fixed version is: 4.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2018-10244 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Suricata version 4.0.4 incorrectly handles the parsing of an EtherNet/IP PDU. A malformed PDU can cause the parsing code to read beyond the allocated data because DecodeENIPPDU in app-layer-enip-commmon.c has an integer overflow during a length check. | ||||
| CVE-2018-10242 | 2 Debian, Oisf | 2 Debian Linux, Suricata | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Suricata version 4.0.4 incorrectly handles the parsing of the SSH banner. A malformed SSH banner can cause the parsing code to read beyond the allocated data because SSHParseBanner in app-layer-ssh.c lacks a length check. | ||||
| CVE-2013-5919 | 2 Oisf, Openinfosecfoundation | 2 Suricata, Suricata | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Suricata before 1.4.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed SSL record. | ||||