Filtered by vendor Auth0
Subscriptions
Total
34 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-29172 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Lock | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| Auth0 is an authentication broker that supports both social and enterprise identity providers, including Active Directory, LDAP, Google Apps, and Salesforce. In versions before `11.33.0`, when the “additional signup fields” feature [is configured](https://github.com/auth0/lock#additional-sign-up-fields), a malicious actor can inject invalidated HTML code into these additional fields, which is then stored in the service `user_metdata` payload (using the `name` property). Verification emails, when applicable, are generated using this metadata. It is therefor possible for an actor to craft a malicious link by injecting HTML, which is then rendered as the recipient's name within the delivered email template. You are impacted by this vulnerability if you are using `auth0-lock` version `11.32.2` or lower and are using the “additional signup fields” feature in your application. Upgrade to version `11.33.0`. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24794 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Express Openid Connect | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Express OpenID Connect is an Express JS middleware implementing sign on for Express web apps using OpenID Connect. Users of the `requiresAuth` middleware, either directly or through the default `authRequired` option, are vulnerable to an Open Redirect when the middleware is applied to a catch all route. If all routes under `example.com` are protected with the `requiresAuth` middleware, a visit to `http://example.com//google.com` will be redirected to `google.com` after login because the original url reported by the Express framework is not properly sanitized. This vulnerability affects versions prior to 2.7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23541 | 2 Auth0, Redhat | 2 Jsonwebtoken, Openshift Data Foundation | 2024-11-21 | 5 Medium |
| jsonwebtoken is an implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Versions `<= 8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function referring to the `secretOrPublicKey` argument from the readme link will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification, other than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens. If your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function. This issue has been patched, please update to version 9.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23540 | 2 Auth0, Redhat | 2 Jsonwebtoken, Openshift Data Foundation | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 Medium |
| In versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library, lack of algorithm definition in the `jwt.verify()` function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the `none` algorithm for signature verification. Users are affected if you do not specify algorithms in the `jwt.verify()` function. This issue has been fixed, please update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the `jwt.verify()` method. There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the `none` algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in `jwt.verify()` options. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23539 | 2 Auth0, Redhat | 2 Jsonwebtoken, Openshift Data Foundation | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| Versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm. You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than a combination listed in the GitHub Security Advisory as unaffected. This issue has been fixed, please update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure configuration. After updating to version 9.0.0, if you still intend to continue with signing or verifying tokens using invalid key type/algorithm value combinations, you’ll need to set the `allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes` option to `true` in the `sign()` and/or `verify()` functions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23505 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Passport-wsfed-saml2 | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Passport-wsfed-saml2 is a ws-federation protocol and SAML2 tokens authentication provider for Passport. In versions prior to 4.6.3, a remote attacker may be able to bypass WSFed authentication on a website using passport-wsfed-saml2. A successful attack requires that the attacker is in possession of an arbitrary IDP signed assertion. Depending on the IDP used, fully unauthenticated attacks (e.g without access to a valid user) might also be feasible if generation of a signed message can be triggered. This issue is patched in version 4.6.3. Use of SAML2 authentication instead of WSFed is a workaround. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43812 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Nextjs-auth0 | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. Versions before 1.6.2 do not filter out certain returnTo parameter values from the login url, which expose the application to an open redirect vulnerability. Users are advised to upgrade as soon as possible. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2021-41246 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Express Openid Connect | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 Medium |
| Express OpenID Connect is express JS middleware implementing sign on for Express web apps using OpenID Connect. Versions before and including `2.5.1` do not regenerate the session id and session cookie when user logs in. This behavior opens up the application to various session fixation vulnerabilities. Versions `2.5.2` contains a patch for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32702 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Nextjs-auth0 | 2024-11-21 | 8 High |
| The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. Versions before and including `1.4.1` are vulnerable to reflected XSS. An attacker can execute arbitrary code by providing an XSS payload in the `error` query parameter which is then processed by the callback handler as an error message. You are affected by this vulnerability if you are using `@auth0/nextjs-auth0` version `1.4.1` or lower **unless** you are using custom error handling that does not return the error message in an HTML response. Upgrade to version `1.4.1` to resolve. The fix adds basic HTML escaping to the error message and it should not impact your users. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32641 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Lock | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| auth0-lock is Auth0's signin solution. Versions of nauth0-lock before and including `11.30.0` are vulnerable to reflected XSS. An attacker can execute arbitrary code when the library's `flashMessage` feature is utilized and user input or data from URL parameters is incorporated into the `flashMessage` or the library's `languageDictionary` feature is utilized and user input or data from URL parameters is incorporated into the `languageDictionary`. The vulnerability is patched in version 11.30.1. | ||||
| CVE-2020-7948 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Login By Auth0 | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in the Login by Auth0 plugin before 4.0.0 for WordPress. A user can perform an insecure direct object reference. | ||||
| CVE-2020-7947 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Login By Auth0 | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in the Login by Auth0 plugin before 4.0.0 for WordPress. It has numerous fields that can contain data that is pulled from different sources. One issue with this is that the data isn't sanitized, and no input validation is performed, before the exporting of the user data. This can lead to (at least) CSV injection if a crafted Excel document is uploaded. | ||||
| CVE-2020-6753 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Login By Auth0 | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Login by Auth0 plugin before 4.0.0 for WordPress allows stored XSS on multiple pages, a different issue than CVE-2020-5392. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5392 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Wp-auth0 | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Auth0 plugin before 4.0.0 for WordPress via the settings page. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5391 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Wp-auth0 | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities exist in the Auth0 plugin before 4.0.0 for WordPress via the domain field. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5263 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Auth0.js | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| auth0.js (NPM package auth0-js) greater than version 8.0.0 and before version 9.12.3 has a vulnerability. In the case of an (authentication) error, the error object returned by the library contains the original request of the user, which may include the plaintext password the user entered. If the error object is exposed or logged without modification, the application risks password exposure. This is fixed in version 9.12.3 | ||||
| CVE-2020-15259 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Ad\/ldap Connector | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| ad-ldap-connector's admin panel before version 5.0.13 does not provide csrf protection, which when exploited may result in remote code execution or confidential data loss. CSRF exploits may occur if the user visits a malicious page containing CSRF payload on the same machine that has access to the ad-ldap-connector admin console via a browser. You may be affected if you use the admin console included with ad-ldap-connector versions <=5.0.12. If you do not have ad-ldap-connector admin console enabled or do not visit any other public URL while on the machine it is installed on, you are not affected. The issue is fixed in version 5.0.13. | ||||
| CVE-2020-15240 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Omniauth-auth0 | 2024-11-21 | 7.4 High |
| omniauth-auth0 (rubygems) versions >= 2.3.0 and < 2.4.1 improperly validate the JWT token signature when using the `jwt_validator.verify` method. Improper validation of the JWT token signature can allow an attacker to bypass authentication and authorization. You are affected by this vulnerability if all of the following conditions apply: 1. You are using `omniauth-auth0`. 2. You are using `JWTValidator.verify` method directly OR you are not authenticating using the SDK’s default Authorization Code Flow. The issue is patched in version 2.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2020-15125 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Auth0.js | 2024-11-21 | 7.7 High |
| In auth0 (npm package) versions before 2.27.1, a DenyList of specific keys that should be sanitized from the request object contained in the error object is used. The key for Authorization header is not sanitized and in certain cases the Authorization header value can be logged exposing a bearer token. You are affected by this vulnerability if you are using the auth0 npm package, and you are using a Machine to Machine application authorized to use Auth0's management API | ||||
| CVE-2020-15119 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Lock | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 Medium |
| In auth0-lock versions before and including 11.25.1, dangerouslySetInnerHTML is used to update the DOM. When dangerouslySetInnerHTML is used, the application and its users might be exposed to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. | ||||