Filtered by vendor Plone
Subscriptions
Total
114 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-23756 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The HTTP PUT and DELETE methods are enabled in the Plone official Docker version 5.2.13 (5221), allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute dangerous actions such as uploading files to the server or deleting them. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23055 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone Docker Official Image | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue in Plone Docker Official Image 5.2.13 (5221) open-source software allows for remote code execution via improper validation of input by the HOST headers. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23054 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone Docker Official Image | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue in Plone Docker Official Image 5.2.13 (5221) open-source software that could allow for remote code execution due to a package listed in ++plone++static/components not existing in the public package index (npm). | ||||
| CVE-2024-0669 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 6.3 Medium |
| A Cross-Frame Scripting vulnerability has been found on Plone CMS affecting verssion below 6.0.5. An attacker could store a malicious URL to be opened by an administrator and execute a malicios iframe element. | ||||
| CVE-2023-42457 | 1 Plone | 1 Rest | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| plone.rest allows users to use HTTP verbs such as GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc. in Plone. Starting in the 2.x branch and prior to versions 2.0.1 and 3.0.1, when the `++api++` traverser is accidentally used multiple times in a url, handling it takes increasingly longer, making the server less responsive. Patches are available in `plone.rest` 2.0.1 and 3.0.1. Series 1.x is not affected. As a workaround, one may redirect `/++api++/++api++` to `/++api++` in one's frontend web server (nginx, Apache). | ||||
| CVE-2023-41048 | 1 Plone | 2 Namedfile, Plone | 2024-11-21 | 3.7 Low |
| plone.namedfile allows users to handle `File` and `Image` fields targeting, but not depending on, Plone Dexterity content. Prior to versions 5.6.1, 6.0.3, 6.1.3, and 6.2.1, there is a stored cross site scripting vulnerability for SVG images. A security hotfix from 2021 already partially fixed this by making sure SVG images are always downloaded instead of shown inline. But the same problem still exists for scales of SVG images. Note that an image tag with an SVG image as source is not vulnerable, even when the SVG image contains malicious code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first need to upload an image, and then trick a user into following a specially crafted link. Patches are available in versions 5.6.1 (for Plone 5.2), 6.0.3 (for Plone 6.0.0-6.0.4), 6.1.3 (for Plone 6.0.5-6.0.6), and 6.2.1 (for Plone 6.0.7). There are no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24740 | 1 Plone | 1 Volto | 2024-11-21 | 5 Medium |
| Volto is a ReactJS-based frontend for the Plone Content Management System. Between versions 14.0.0-alpha.5 and 15.0.0-alpha.0, a user could have their authentication cookie replaced with an authentication cookie from another user, effectively giving them control of the other user's account and privileges. This occurs when using an outdated version of the `react-cookie` library and a server is under high load. A proof of concept does not currently exist, but it is possible for this issue to occur in the wild. The patch and fix is present in Volto 15.0.0-alpha.0. As a workaround, one may manually upgrade the `react-cookie` package to 4.1.1 and then override all Volto components that use this library. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23599 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| Products.ATContentTypes are the core content types for Plone 2.1 - 4.3. Versions of Plone that are dependent on Products.ATContentTypes prior to version 3.0.6 are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting and open redirect when an attacker can get a compromised version of the image_view_fullscreen page in a cache, for example in Varnish. The technique is known as cache poisoning. Any later visitor can get redirected when clicking on a link on this page. Usually only anonymous users are affected, but this depends on the user's cache settings. Version 3.0.6 of Products.ATContentTypes has been released with a fix. This version works on Plone 5.2, Python 2 only. As a workaround, make sure the image_view_fullscreen page is not stored in the cache. More information about the vulnerability and cvmitigation measures is available in the GitHub Security Advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3313 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| Plone CMS until version 5.2.4 has a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the user fullname property and the file upload functionality. The user's input data is not properly encoded when being echoed back to the user. This data can be interpreted as executable code by the browser and allows an attacker to execute JavaScript in the context of the victim's browser if the victim opens a vulnerable page containing an XSS payload. | ||||
| CVE-2021-35959 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| In Plone 5.0 through 5.2.4, Editors are vulnerable to XSS in the folder contents view, if a Contributor has created a folder with a SCRIPT tag in the description field. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33926 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| An issue in Plone CMS v. 5.2.4, 5.2.3, 5.2.2, 5.2.1, 5.2.0, 5.1rc2, 5.1rc1, 5.1b4, 5.1b3, 5.1b2, 5.1a2, 5.1a1, 5.1.7, 5.1.6, 5.1.5, 5.1.4, 5.1.2, 5.1.1 5.1, 5.0rc3, 5.0rc2, 5.0rc1, 5.0.9, 5.0.8, 5.0.7, 5.0.6, 5.0.5, 5.0.4, 5.0.3, 5.0.2, 5.0.10, 5.0.1, 5.0, 4.3.9, 4.3.8, 4.3.7, 4.3.6, 4.3.5, 4.3.4, 4.3.3, 4.3.20, 4 allows attacker to access sensitive information via the RSS feed protlet. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33513 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| Plone through 5.2.4 allows XSS via the inline_diff methods in Products.CMFDiffTool. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33512 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| Plone through 5.2.4 allows stored XSS attacks (by a Contributor) by uploading an SVG or HTML document. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33511 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Plone though 5.2.4 allows SSRF via the lxml parser. This affects Diazo themes, Dexterity TTW schemas, and modeleditors in plone.app.theming, plone.app.dexterity, and plone.supermodel. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33510 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| Plone through 5.2.4 allows remote authenticated managers to conduct SSRF attacks via an event ical URL, to read one line of a file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33509 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 9.9 Critical |
| Plone through 5.2.4 allows remote authenticated managers to perform disk I/O via crafted keyword arguments to the ReStructuredText transform in a Python script. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33508 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| Plone through 5.2.4 allows XSS via a full name that is mishandled during rendering of the ownership tab of a content item. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33507 | 2 Plone, Zope | 2 Plone, Zope | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| Zope Products.CMFCore before 2.5.1 and Products.PluggableAuthService before 2.6.2, as used in Plone through 5.2.4 and other products, allow Reflected XSS. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32806 | 1 Plone | 1 Isurlinportal | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Products.isurlinportal is a replacement for isURLInPortal method in Plone. Versions of Products.isurlinportal prior to 1.2.0 have an Open Redirect vulnerability. Various parts of Plone use the 'is url in portal' check for security, mostly to see if it is safe to redirect to a url. A url like `https://example.org` is not in the portal. The url `https:example.org` without slashes is considered to be in the portal. When redirecting, some browsers go to `https://example.org`, others give an error. Attackers may use this to redirect victims to their site, especially as part of a phishing attack. The problem has been patched in Products.isurlinportal 1.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32633 | 2 Plone, Zope | 2 Plone, Zope | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
| Zope is an open-source web application server. In Zope versions prior to 4.6 and 5.2, users can access untrusted modules indirectly through Python modules that are available for direct use. By default, only users with the Manager role can add or edit Zope Page Templates through the web, but sites that allow untrusted users to add/edit Zope Page Templates through the web are at risk from this vulnerability. The problem has been fixed in Zope 5.2 and 4.6. As a workaround, a site administrator can restrict adding/editing Zope Page Templates through the web using the standard Zope user/role permission mechanisms. Untrusted users should not be assigned the Zope Manager role and adding/editing Zope Page Templates through the web should be restricted to trusted users only. | ||||