| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability has been found in Bdtask/CodeCanyon Wholesale Inventory Control and Inventory Management System up to 20250320. This issue affects some unknown processing. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability was detected in Bdtask/CodeCanyon SalesERP up to 20250728. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| An insufficient validation of an untrusted input vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma® Browser allows a locally authenticated non-admin user to revert the browser’s security controls. |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect QuLog Center. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to gain privileges or hijack user identities.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
QuLog Center 1.8.2.927 ( 2025/09/17 ) and later |
| An attacker can upload an arbitrary file instead of a plant image. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Salmen2/Simple-Faucet-Script v1.07 via crafted POST request to admin.php?p=ads&c=1 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in xxl-api v1.3.0 allows attackers to arbitrarily add users to the management module via a crafted GET request. |
| Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap Community Edition prior to version 16.13.99.1761813675 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to versions 16.13-5 and 16.12-8 don't have cross-site request forgery protection in the management of SVN commit rules and immutable tags. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into changing the commit rules or immutable tags of a SVN repo. Tuleap Community Edition 16.13.99.1761813675, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.13-5, and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.12-8 contain a fix for the issue. |
| Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap Community Edition prior to version 16.13.99.1762267347 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to versions 17.01-, 16.13-6, and 16.12-9 don't have cross-site request forgery protections in the file release system. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into changing the commit rules or immutable tags of a SVN repo. Tuleap Community Edition 16.13.99.1762267347, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0-1, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.13-6, and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.12-9 fix the issue. |
| The SureForms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.13.1 via the '_srfm_email_notification' post meta registration. This is due to setting the 'auth_callback' parameter to '__return_true', which allows unauthenticated access to the metadata. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including email notification configurations, which frequently contain vendor-provided CRM/help desk dropbox addresses, CC/BCC recipients, and notification templates that can be abused to inject malicious data into downstream systems. |
| A flaw has been found in Fabian Ros/SourceCodester Simple E-Banking System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. |
| Mattermost Mobile Apps versions <=2.32.0 fail to verify that SSO redirect tokens originate from the trusted server, which allows a malicious Mattermost instance or on-path attacker to obtain user session credentials via crafted token-in-URL responses |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ramon fincken Auto Prune Posts auto-prune-posts allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Auto Prune Posts: from n/a through <= 3.0.0. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes WP Plugin Manager wp-plugin-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Plugin Manager: from n/a through <= 1.4.7. |
| The YSlider plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce verification on the content configuration page and insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The injected scripts will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| CodeChecker is an analyzer tooling, defect database and viewer extension for the Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy.
Cross-site request forgery allows an unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a logged in user, and use the web API with the same permissions, including but not limited to adding, removing or editing products. The attacker needs to know the ID of the available products to modify or delete them. The attacker cannot directly exfiltrate data (view) from CodeChecker, due to being limited to form-based CSRF.
This issue affects CodeChecker: through 6.24.4. |
| The Asgaros Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the set_subscription_level() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the subscription settings of authenticated users via a forged request granted they can trick a logged-in user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The TwitterPosts WordPress plugin through 1.0.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in code-projects Traffic Offense Reporting System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| Incorrect security UI in Fullscreen UI in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.59 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
