Total
2909 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-39374 | 1 Matrix | 1 Synapse | 2025-01-15 | 6.5 Medium |
Synapse is an open-source Matrix homeserver written and maintained by the Matrix.org Foundation. If Synapse and a malicious homeserver are both joined to the same room, the malicious homeserver can trick Synapse into accepting previously rejected events into its view of the current state of that room. This can be exploited in a way that causes all further messages and state changes sent in that room from the vulnerable homeserver to be rejected. This issue has been patched in version 1.68.0 | ||||
CVE-2025-21230 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2025-21231 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
IP Helper Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2025-21300 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
Windows upnphost.dll Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2025-21270 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2025-21218 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
Windows Kerberos Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2025-21207 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
Windows Connected Devices Platform Service (Cdpsvc) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2025-21330 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
Windows Remote Desktop Services Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2025-21389 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
Windows upnphost.dll Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2025-21290 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2025-21289 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2025-21251 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2024-49075 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 7 more | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High |
Windows Remote Desktop Services Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2024-49129 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 and 2 more | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High |
Windows Remote Desktop Gateway (RD Gateway) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2024-49096 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High |
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2023-28217 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
Windows Network Address Translation (NAT) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2023-33720 | 1 Mp4v2 Project | 1 Mp4v2 | 2025-01-14 | 6.5 Medium |
mp4v2 v2.1.2 was discovered to contain a memory leak via the class MP4BytesProperty. | ||||
CVE-2019-9518 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 26 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 23 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
CVE-2017-12076 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in SYNO.Core.PortForwarding.Rules in Synology DiskStation (DSM) before 6.1.1-15088 allows remote authenticated attacker to exhaust the memory resources of the machine, causing a denial of service attack. | ||||
CVE-2019-9511 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 29 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 26 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. |