| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability was determined in FeehiCMS up to 2.1.1. Impacted is an unknown function of the file frontend/web/timthumb.php of the component TimThumb. Executing manipulation of the argument src can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| PodcastGenerator 3.2.9 contains a blind server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to inject XML in the episode upload form. Attackers can manipulate the 'shortdesc' parameter to trigger external HTTP requests to arbitrary endpoints during podcast episode creation. |
| fetch-mcp v1.0.2 and before is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, which allows attackers to bypass private IP validation and access internal network resources. |
| A critical vulnerability has been identified in givanz VvvebJs 1.7.2, which allows both Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and arbitrary file reading. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of user-supplied URLs in the "file_get_contents" function within the "save.php" file. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Youzify Youzify youzify allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Youzify: from n/a through <= 1.3.5. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in bdthemes Prime Slider – Addons For Elementor bdthemes-prime-slider-lite allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Prime Slider – Addons For Elementor: from n/a through <= 4.0.10. |
| Teradek VidiU Pro 3.0.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the management interface that allows attackers to manipulate GET parameters 'url' and 'xml_url'. Attackers can exploit this flaw to bypass firewalls, initiate network enumeration, and potentially trigger external HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in HETWORKS WordPress Image shrinker allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WordPress Image shrinker: from n/a through 1.1.0. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in 6Storage 6Storage Rentals 6storage-rentals allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects 6Storage Rentals: from n/a through <= 2.19.9. |
| A vulnerability was determined in YunaiV yudao-cloud up to 2025.11. This affects the function BpmHttpCallbackTrigger/BpmSyncHttpRequestTrigger of the component Business Process Management. Executing manipulation of the argument url/header/body can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| FastGPT is a knowledge-based platform built on the LLMs. Since the web crawling plug-in does not perform intranet IP verification, an attacker can initiate an intranet IP request, causing the system to initiate a request through the intranet and potentially obtain some private data on the intranet. This issue is fixed in 4.9.0. |
| FastGPT is an AI Agent building platform. Prior to version 4.11.1, in the workflow file reading node, the network link is not security-verified, posing a risk of SSRF attacks. This issue has been patched in version 4.11.1. |
| Hemmelig is a messing app with with client-side encryption and self-destructing messages. Prior to version 7.3.3, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) filter bypass vulnerability exists in the webhook URL validation of the Secret Requests feature. The application attempts to block internal/private IP addresses but can be bypassed using DNS rebinding or open redirect services. This allows an authenticated user to make the server initiate HTTP requests to internal network resources. Version 7.3.3 contains a patch for the issue. |
| Local Deep Research is an AI-powered research assistant for deep, iterative research. In versions from 1.3.0 to before 1.3.9, the download service (download_service.py) makes HTTP requests using raw requests.get() without utilizing the application's SSRF protection (safe_requests.py). This can allow attackers to access internal services and attempt to reach cloud provider metadata endpoints (AWS/GCP/Azure), as well as perform internal network reconnaissance, by submitting malicious URLs through the API, depending on the deployment and surrounding controls. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.9. |
| httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Yannick Lefebvre Link Library link-library allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Link Library: from n/a through <= 7.8.4. |
| Hasura GraphQL 1.3.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to inject arbitrary remote schema URLs through the add_remote_schema endpoint. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by sending crafted POST requests to the /v1/query endpoint with malicious URL definitions to potentially access internal network resources. |
| All versions of the package github.com/greenpau/caddy-security are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via X-Forwarded-Host header manipulation. An attacker can expose sensitive information, interact with internal services, or exploit other vulnerabilities within the network by exploiting this vulnerability. |
| Custom Question Answering Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Versions starting with 0.211.0 and prior to 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0 contain a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in their workflow expression evaluation system. Under certain conditions, expressions supplied by authenticated users during workflow configuration may be evaluated in an execution context that is not sufficiently isolated from the underlying runtime. An authenticated attacker could abuse this behavior to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the n8n process. Successful exploitation may lead to full compromise of the affected instance, including unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of workflows, and execution of system-level operations. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to a patched version, which introduces additional safeguards to restrict expression evaluation. If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations: Limit workflow creation and editing permissions to fully trusted users only; and/or deploy n8n in a hardened environment with restricted operating system privileges and network access to reduce the impact of potential exploitation. These workarounds do not fully eliminate the risk and should only be used as short-term measures. |
