| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Portal component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and 10.1.4.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-0983 and CVE-2009-3407. |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the EmChartBean server side component for Oracle Application Server 10g allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unknown vectors, probably "\.." sequences in the beanId parameter. NOTE: this is likely a duplicate of another CVE that Oracle addressed in CPU Jan 2007, but due to lack of details by Oracle, it is unclear which BugID this issue is associated with, so the other CVE cannot be determined. Possibilities include EM02 (CVE-2007-0292) or EM05 (CVE-2007-0293). |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Forms in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3 and 10.1.2.0.2, and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10CU2, has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka Vuln# FORM02. |
| Multiple CRLF injection vulnerabilities in Oracle Portal 9.0.2 and possibly other versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in the enc parameter to (1) calendarDialog.jsp or (2) fred.jsp. NOTE: the calendar.jsp vector is covered by CVE-2006-6697. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Process Mgmt & Notification component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.3.3 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka AS01. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Single Sign-On component in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.2, and 10.1.2.2, and Collaboration Suite 10.1.2, has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka AS09 or AS9. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Oracle Reports Web Cartridge (RWCGI60) in the Workflow Cartridge component, as used in Oracle Database 9.2.0.8, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3; Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.2, and 10.1.2.2; Collaboration Suite 10.1.2; and Oracle E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10CU2; allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary HTML or web script via the genuser parameter to rwcgi60, aka OWF01. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle HTTP Server 9.0.1.5, Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.0, 10.1.2.0.2, and 10.1.2.2; and Collaboration Suite 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2; has unknown impact and attack vectors related to the Oracle Process Mgmt & Notification component, aka OPMN01. NOTE: as of 20070123, Oracle has not disputed claims by a reliable researcher that OPMN01 is for a buffer overflow in Oracle Notification Service (ONS). |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3 and Collaboration Suite 9.0.4.2 has unknown impact and attack vectors related to Oracle Containers for J2EE, aka OC4J02. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.2, and 10.1.2.2; Collaboration Suite 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2; and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10CU2 has unknown impact and attack vectors related to Oracle Reports Developer, aka REP01. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.0, and 10.1.2.0.2; and Collaboration Suite 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2; has unknown impact and attack vectors related to Containers for J2EE, aka OC4J08. |
| Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f). |
| Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'. |
| The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). |
