Filtered by vendor Artifex
Subscriptions
Total
224 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-45005 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mujs | 2024-08-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| Artifex MuJS v1.1.3 was discovered to contain a heap buffer overflow which is caused by conflicting JumpList of nested try/finally statements. | ||||
| CVE-2021-37220 | 2 Artifex, Fedoraproject | 2 Mupdf, Fedora | 2024-08-04 | 5.5 Medium |
| MuPDF through 1.18.1 has an out-of-bounds write because the cached color converter does not properly consider the maximum key size of a hash table. This can, for example, be seen with crafted "mutool draw" input. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33797 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mujs | 2024-08-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| Buffer-overflow in jsdtoa.c in Artifex MuJS in versions 1.0.1 to 1.1.1. An integer overflow happens when js_strtod() reads in floating point exponent, which leads to a buffer overflow in the pointer *d. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33796 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mujs | 2024-08-03 | 10 Critical |
| In MuJS before version 1.1.2, a use-after-free flaw in the regexp source property access may cause denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4216 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mupdf | 2024-08-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| A Floating point exception (division-by-zero) flaw was found in Mupdf for zero width pages in muraster.c. It is fixed in Mupdf-1.20.0-rc1 upstream. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3781 | 2 Artifex, Fedoraproject | 2 Ghostscript, Fedora | 2024-08-03 | 9.9 Critical |
| A trivial sandbox (enabled with the `-dSAFER` option) escape flaw was found in the ghostscript interpreter by injecting a specially crafted pipe command. This flaw allows a specially crafted document to execute arbitrary commands on the system in the context of the ghostscript interpreter. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3407 | 3 Artifex, Debian, Fedoraproject | 3 Mupdf, Debian Linux, Fedora | 2024-08-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in mupdf 1.18.0. Double free of object during linearization may lead to memory corruption and other potential consequences. | ||||
| CVE-2022-44789 | 3 Artifex, Debian, Fedoraproject | 3 Mujs, Debian Linux, Fedora | 2024-08-03 | 8.8 High |
| A logical issue in O_getOwnPropertyDescriptor() in Artifex MuJS 1.0.0 through 1.3.x before 1.3.2 allows an attacker to achieve Remote Code Execution through memory corruption, via the loading of a crafted JavaScript file. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30975 | 3 Artifex, Debian, Fedoraproject | 3 Mujs, Debian Linux, Fedora | 2024-08-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| In Artifex MuJS through 1.2.0, jsP_dumpsyntax in jsdump.c has a NULL pointer dereference, as demonstrated by mujs-pp. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30974 | 3 Artifex, Debian, Fedoraproject | 3 Mujs, Debian Linux, Fedora | 2024-08-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| compile in regexp.c in Artifex MuJS through 1.2.0 results in stack consumption because of unlimited recursion, a different issue than CVE-2019-11413. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2085 | 2 Artifex, Fedoraproject | 2 Ghostscript, Fedora | 2024-08-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability was found in Ghostscript, which occurs when it tries to render a large number of bits in memory. When allocating a buffer device, it relies on an init_device_procs defined for the device that uses it as a prototype that depends upon the number of bits per pixel. For bpp > 64, mem_x_device is used and does not have an init_device_procs defined. This flaw allows an attacker to parse a large number of bits (more than 64 bits per pixel), which triggers a NULL pointer dereference flaw, causing an application to crash. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1350 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostpcl | 2024-08-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in GhostPCL 9.55.0. This vulnerability affects the function chunk_free_object of the file gsmchunk.c. The manipulation with a malicious file leads to a memory corruption. The attack can be initiated remotely but requires user interaction. The exploit has been disclosed to the public as a POC and may be used. It is recommended to apply the patches to fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-51104 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mupdf | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| A floating point exception (divide-by-zero) vulnerability was discovered in Artifex MuPDF 1.23.4 in function pnm_binary_read_image() of load-pnm.c when span equals zero. | ||||
| CVE-2023-51103 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mupdf | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| A floating point exception (divide-by-zero) vulnerability was discovered in Artifex MuPDF 1.23.4 in the function fz_new_pixmap_from_float_data() of pixmap.c. | ||||
| CVE-2023-51105 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mupdf | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| A floating point exception (divide-by-zero) vulnerability was discovered in Artifex MuPDF 1.23.4 in function bmp_decompress_rle4() of load-bmp.c. | ||||
| CVE-2023-51106 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mupdf | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| A floating point exception (divide-by-zero) vulnerability was discovered in mupdf 1.23.4 in function pnm_binary_read_image() of load-pnm.c when fz_colorspace_n returns zero. | ||||
| CVE-2023-46751 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostscript | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in the function gdev_prn_open_printer_seekable() in Artifex Ghostscript through 10.02.0 allows remote attackers to crash the application via a dangling pointer. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29509 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostscript | 2024-08-02 | 8.8 High |
| Artifex Ghostscript before 10.03.0 has a heap-based overflow when PDFPassword (e.g., for runpdf) has a \000 byte in the middle. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29506 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostscript | 2024-08-02 | 8.8 High |
| Artifex Ghostscript before 10.03.0 has a stack-based buffer overflow in the pdfi_apply_filter() function via a long PDF filter name. | ||||
| CVE-2023-43115 | 3 Artifex, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 4 Ghostscript, Fedora, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-08-02 | 8.8 High |
| In Artifex Ghostscript through 10.01.2, gdevijs.c in GhostPDL can lead to remote code execution via crafted PostScript documents because they can switch to the IJS device, or change the IjsServer parameter, after SAFER has been activated. NOTE: it is a documented risk that the IJS server can be specified on a gs command line (the IJS device inherently must execute a command to start the IJS server). | ||||