| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Invalid memory access in Sentencepiece versions less than 0.2.1 when using a vulnerable model file, which is not created in the normal training procedure. |
| An Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Hubitat Elevation home automation controllers prior to version 2.4.2.157 could allow a remote authenticated user to control connected devices outside of their authorized scope via client-side request manipulation. |
| Gitea may send release notification emails for private repositories to users whose access has been revoked. When a repository is changed from public to private, users who previously watched the repository may continue to receive release notifications, potentially disclosing release titles, tags, and content. |
| A maliciously crafted HTML payload, stored in a part’s attribute and clicked by a user, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. |
| A maliciously crafted HTML payload in a design name, when displayed during the delete confirmation dialog and clicked by a user, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. |
| An authentication weakness was identified in Omada Controllers, Gateways and Access Points, controller-device adoption due to improper handling of random values. Exploitation requires advanced network positioning and allows an attacker to intercept adoption traffic and forge valid authentication through offline precomputation, potentially exposing sensitive information and compromising confidentiality. |
| A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in a parameter in Omada Controllers due to improper input sanitization. Exploitation requires advanced conditions, such as network positioning or emulating a trusted entity, and user interaction by an authenticated administrator. If successful, an attacker could execute arbitrary JavaScript in the administrator’s browser, potentially exposing sensitive information and compromising confidentiality. |
| This vulnerability occurs when a WebSocket endpoint does not enforce
proper authentication mechanisms, allowing unauthorized users to
establish connections. As a result, attackers can exploit this weakness
to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data or perform unauthorized
actions. Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to
privilege escalation and potentially compromise the security of the
entire system. |
| An attacker could decrypt sensitive data, impersonate legitimate users
or devices, and potentially gain access to network resources for lateral
attacks. |
| sigstore framework is a common go library shared across sigstore services and clients. In versions 1.10.3 and below, the legacy TUF client (pkg/tuf/client.go) supports caching target files to disk. It constructs a filesystem path by joining a cache base directory with a target name sourced from signed target metadata; however, it does not validate that the resulting path stays within the cache base directory. A malicious TUF repository can trigger arbitrary file overwriting, limited to the permissions that the calling process has. Note that this should only affect clients that are directly using the TUF client in sigstore/sigstore or are using an older version of Cosign. Public Sigstore deployment users are unaffected, as TUF metadata is validated by a quorum of trusted collaborators. This issue has been fixed in version 1.10.4. As a workaround, users can disable disk caching for the legacy client by setting SIGSTORE_NO_CACHE=true in the environment, migrate to https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go/tree/main/pkg/tuf, or upgrade to the latest sigstore/sigstore release. |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in scriptsbundle CarSpot carspot allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects CarSpot: from n/a through < 2.4.6. |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in RealMag777 TableOn posts-table-filterable allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects TableOn: from n/a through <= 1.0.4.2. |
| The fix applied in CVE-2025-22228 inadvertently broke the timing attack mitigation implemented in DaoAuthenticationProvider. This can allow attackers to infer valid usernames or other authentication behavior via response-time differences under certain configurations. |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in wpWave Hide My WP hide_my_wp allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Hide My WP: from n/a through <= 6.2.12. |
| Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in Edge-Themes Eldon eldon allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Eldon: from n/a through <= 1.0. |
| An attacker with access to the project file could use the exposed
credentials to impersonate users, escalate privileges, or gain
unauthorized access to systems and services. The absence of robust
encryption or secure handling mechanisms increases the likelihood of
this type of exploitation, leaving sensitive information more
vulnerable. |
| An issue with WordPress directory names in WebPros WordPress Toolkit before 6.9.1 allows privilege escalation. |
| This vulnerability occurs when the system permits multiple simultaneous
connections to the backend using the same charging station ID. This can
result in unauthorized access, data inconsistency, or potential
manipulation of charging sessions. The lack of proper session management
and expiration control allows attackers to exploit this weakness by
reusing valid charging station IDs to establish multiple sessions
concurrently. |
| PHPgurukul Online Course Registration v3.1 lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection on all administrative forms. An attacker can perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated administrators by tricking them into visiting a malicious webpage. |
| File Upload vulnerability in TMS Global Software TMS Management Console v.6.3.7.27386.20250818 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Logo upload in /Customer/AddEdit |
