CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
A Disclosure of Sensitive Information vulnerability in HPE SiteScope version v11.2x, v11.3x was found. |
A Disclosure of Sensitive Information vulnerability in HPE SiteScope version v11.2x, v11.3x was found. |
A Disclosure of Sensitive Information vulnerability in HPE SiteScope version v11.2x, v11.3x was found. |
A Remote Bypass Security Restriction vulnerability in HPE Network Node Manager i (NNMi) Software versions v10.0x, v10.1x, v10.2x was found. |
A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE UCMDB version v10.10, v10.11, v10.20, v10.21, v10.22, v10.30, v10.31 was found. |
A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Aruba AirWave Glass version v1.0.0 and 1.0.1 was found. |
A Remote Unauthorized Disclosure of Information vulnerability in HPE IceWall Federation Agent version 3.0 was found. |
A Remote Disclosure of Information vulnerability in HPE Cloud Optimizer version v3.0x was found. |
In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization. |
In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. |
An access restriction bypass vulnerability in HPE Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version 6.6.x was found. |
An arbitrary command execution vulnerability in HPE Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version 6.6.x was found. |
A reflected cross site scripting vulnerability in HPE Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version 6.6.x was found. |
An authenticated remote code execution vulnerability in HPE Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version 6.6.x was found. |
A privilege escalation vulnerability in HPE Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version 6.6.x was found. |
An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in HPE Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version 6.6.x was found. |
A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT version 7.3 E0504P04 was found. |
A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT version 7.3 E0504P04 was found. |
A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT version 7.3 E0504P04 was found. |
A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT version 7.3 E0504P04 was found. |