| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-11599. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-11599. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-11599 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-1197. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-1197. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-1197 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA based off of CNT 3. Further investigation determined that there was a secure method for using the directive. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not an exploitable issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6496, CVE-2012-6497. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but the candidate was publicly used to label concerns about multiple products. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2012-6496 and CVE-2012-6497 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4858. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-4858. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-4858 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the chat functionality of parisneo/lollms-webui in the latest version. This vulnerability allows an attacker to inject malicious scripts via chat messages, which are then executed in the context of the user's browser. |
| A DoS vulnerability exists in Rack <v3.0.4.2, <v2.2.6.3, <v2.1.4.3 and <v2.0.9.3 within in the Multipart MIME parsing code in which could allow an attacker to craft requests that can be abuse to cause multipart parsing to take longer than expected. |
| There's a possible information leak / session hijack vulnerability in Rack (RubyGem rack). This vulnerability is patched in versions 1.6.12 and 2.0.8. Attackers may be able to find and hijack sessions by using timing attacks targeting the session id. Session ids are usually stored and indexed in a database that uses some kind of scheme for speeding up lookups of that session id. By carefully measuring the amount of time it takes to look up a session, an attacker may be able to find a valid session id and hijack the session. The session id itself may be generated randomly, but the way the session is indexed by the backing store does not use a secure comparison. |
| There is a denial of service vulnerability in the Content-Disposition parsingcomponent of Rack fixed in 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.4.1, 3.0.0.1. This could allow an attacker to craft an input that can cause Content-Disposition header parsing in Rackto take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial ofservice attack vector. This header is used typically used in multipartparsing. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtuallyall Rails applications) are impacted. |
| A denial of service vulnerability in the Range header parsing component of Rack >= 1.5.0. A Carefully crafted input can cause the Range header parsing component in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that deal with Range requests (such as streaming applications, or applications that serve files) may be impacted. |
| A denial of service vulnerability in the multipart parsing component of Rack fixed in 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.4.1 and 3.0.0.1 could allow an attacker tocraft input that can cause RFC2183 multipart boundary parsing in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtually all Rails applications) are impacted. |
| Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Airflow.This issue affects Apache Airflow: before 2.5.2.
|
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in the Apache Airflow Sqoop Provider.
This issue affects Apache Airflow Sqoop Provider versions before 3.1.1.
|
| Tenda AC5 US_AC5V1.0RTL_V15.03.06.28 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the fromSetWirelessRepeat function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload. |
