| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not restrict unauthenticated access to certain pages of the web interface. This could allow an attacker to delete log files without authentication. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not handle uploaded files correctly. An unauthenticated attacker could take advantage of this situation to store an XSS attack, which could - when a legitimate user accesses the error logs - perform arbitrary actions in the name of the user. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). The web based management interface of affected devices does not employ special access protection for certain internal developer views. This could allow unauthenticated users to extract internal configuration details. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not properly validate input in the configuration interface. This could allow an authenticated attacker to place persistent XSS attacks to perform arbitrary actions in the name of a logged user which accesses the affected views. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). The web based management interface of affected devices does not employ special access protection for certain internal developer views. This could allow authenticated users to access critical device information. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices use a limited range for challenges that are sent during the unencrypted challenge-response communication. An unauthenticated attacker could capture a valid challenge-response pair generated by a legitimate user, and request the webpage repeatedly to wait for the same challenge to reappear for which the correct response is known. This could allow the attacker to access the management interface of the device. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not properly handle the input of a GET request parameter. The provided argument is directly reflected in the web server response. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform reflected XSS attacks. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not encrypt web traffic with clients but communicate in cleartext via HTTP. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to capture the traffic and interfere with the functionality of the device. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not properly validate parameters of certain GET and POST requests. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to set the device to a denial of service state or to control the program counter and, thus, execute arbitrary code on the device. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not properly validate parameters of POST requests. This could allow an authenticated attacker to set the device to a denial of service state or to control the program counter and, thus, execute arbitrary code on the device. |
| A flaw was found in multiple versions of OpenvSwitch. Specially crafted LLDP packets can cause memory to be lost when allocating data to handle specific optional TLVs, potentially causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. |
| xmlParseBalancedChunkMemoryRecover in parser.c in libxml2 before 2.9.10 has a memory leak related to newDoc->oldNs. |
| xmlStringLenDecodeEntities in parser.c in libxml2 2.9.10 has an infinite loop in a certain end-of-file situation. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V4.0 SP1). Affected applications are vulnerable to SQL injection through getTotalAndFilterCounts endpoint. An authenticated low privileged attacker could exploit to insert data and achieve privilege escalation. (ZDI-CAN-26570) |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM GridEdge (Classic) (All versions < V2.7.3). The affected application uses an improperly protected file to import SSH keys. This could allow attackers with access to the filesystem of the host on which SICAM GridEdge runs to inject a custom SSH key to that file. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM GridEdge (Classic) (All versions < V2.6.6). The affected application discloses password hashes of other users upon request. This could allow an authenticated user to retrieve another user's password hash. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM GridEdge (Classic) (All versions < V2.6.6). The affected application does not require authenticated access for privileged functions. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to create a new user with administrative permissions. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM GridEdge (Classic) (All versions < V2.6.6). The affected application does not require authenticated access for privileged functions. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to change data of a user, such as credentials, in case that user's id is known. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM GridEdge (Classic) (All versions < V2.6.6). The affected software does not apply cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) restrictions for critical operations. In case an attacker tricks a legitimate user into accessing a special resource a malicious request could be executed. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V9.40 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V9.40 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.40). Affected devices lack proper validation of http request parameters of the hosted web service.
An unauthenticated remote attacker could send specially crafted packets that could cause denial of service condition of the target device. |
