| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| Vulnerability of undefined permissions in HUAWEI VR screen projection.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will cause third-party apps to create windows in an arbitrary way, consuming system resources. |
| Unauthorized access vulnerability in the Save for later feature provided by AI Touch.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause third-party apps to forge a URI for unauthorized access with zero permissions. |
| In CacheOpPMRExec of cache_km.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In RGXCreateZSBufferKM of rgxta3d.c, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor vulnerability [CWE-200] in FortiWeb version 7.4.0, version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.8 and below, 6.3 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to read password hashes of other administrators via CLI commands. |
| In multiple functions of SnoozeHelper.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In sendIntentSender of ActivityManagerService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| There is a misinterpretation of input vulnerability in Huawei Printer. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause the printer service to be abnormal. |
| In multiple methods of UserManagerService.java, there is a possible failure to persist or enforce user restrictions due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| In TBD of TBD, there is a possible confusion of OEM and DRM certificates due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to local bypass of DRM content protection with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In multiple functions of SnoozeHelper.java, there is a possible way to cause a boot loop due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In RGXCreateHWRTData_aux of rgxta3d.c, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| There is a traffic hijacking vulnerability in Huawei routers. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can cause packets to be hijacked by attackers. |
| Multiple improper authorization vulnerabilities [CWE-285] in FortiWeb version 7.4.2 and below, version 7.2.7 and below, version 7.0.10 and below, version 6.4.3 and below, version 6.3.23 and below may allow an authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized ADOM operations via crafted requests. |
| In onCreate of WifiDialogActivity.java, there is a possible way to bypass the DISALLOW_ADD_WIFI_CONFIG restriction due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| An improper authorization in Fortinet FortiWebManager version 7.2.0 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.4 and 6.3.0 and 6.2.3 through 6.2.4 and 6.0.2 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via HTTP requests or CLI. |
| An improper authorization in Fortinet FortiWebManager version 7.2.0 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.4 and 6.3.0 and 6.2.3 through 6.2.4 and 6.0.2 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via HTTP requests or CLI. |
| In RGXFWChangeOSidPriority of rgxfwutils.c, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| An improper authorization in Fortinet FortiWebManager version 7.2.0 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.4 and 6.3.0 and 6.2.3 through 6.2.4 and 6.0.2 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via HTTP requests or CLI. |
