| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC18 15.03.05.05. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function formexeCommand of the file /goform/execCommand. The manipulation of the argument cmdinput leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-257057 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Tenda AC18 15.03.05.05. Affected is the function fromSysToolReboot of the file /goform/SysToolReboot. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-257058 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Tenda TX9 22.03.02.10. This issue affects the function sub_42C014 of the file /goform/PowerSaveSet. The manipulation of the argument time leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-261857 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability was found in Tenda TX9 22.03.02.10. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function sub_42BD7C of the file /goform/SetLEDCfg. The manipulation of the argument time leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-261854 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Tenda TX9 22.03.02.10. This affects the function sub_42CB94 of the file /goform/SetVirtualServerCfg. The manipulation of the argument list leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-261855. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability was found in Tenda W30E 1.0.1.25(633) and classified as critical. This issue affects the function frmL7PlotForm of the file /goform/frmL7ProtForm. The manipulation of the argument page leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-260915. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability was found in Tenda W30E 1.0.1.25(633). It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function fromRouteStatic of the file /goform/fromRouteStatic. The manipulation of the argument page leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-260916. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Tenda W30E 1.0.1.25(633). This affects the function formSetCfm of the file /goform/setcfm. The manipulation of the argument funcpara1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-260913 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability has been found in Tenda W30E 1.0.1.25(633) and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects the function formWriteFacMac of the file /goform/WriteFacMac. The manipulation of the argument mac leads to os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-260914 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| IBM OpenPages with Watson 9.0 may write sensitive information, under specific configurations, in clear text to the system tracing log files that could be obtained by a privileged user. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Oceanwp sticky header plugin <= 1.0.8 on WordPress. |
| IBM Security Verify Governance 10.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 258375. |
| Magma versions <= 1.8.0 (fixed in v1.9 commit 08472ba98b8321f802e95f5622fa90fec2dea486) are susceptible to an assertion-based crash when an oversized NAS packet is received. An attacker may leverage this behavior to repeatedly crash the MME via either a compromised base station or via an unauthenticated cellphone within range of a base station managed by the MME, causing a denial of service. |
| The Product Addons & Fields for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 32.0.6 does not sanitize and escape some of its setting fields, which could allow high-privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example, in multisite setup). |
| The Help Desk WP WordPress plugin through 1.2.0 does not sanitise and escape some parameters, which could allow users with a role as low as Editor to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks. |
| The Clock In Portal- Staff & Attendance Management WordPress plugin through 2.1 does not have CSRF check when deleting Staff members, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary Staff via a CSRF attack |
| The Bit Form WordPress plugin before 1.9 does not validate the file types uploaded via it's file upload form field, allowing unauthenticated users to upload arbitrary files types such as PHP or HTML files to the server, leading to Remote Code Execution. |
| etcd is a distributed key-value store for the data of a distributed system. Prior to versions 3.4.26 and 3.5.9, the LeaseTimeToLive API allows access to key names (not value) associated to a lease when `Keys` parameter is true, even a user doesn't have read permission to the keys. The impact is limited to a cluster which enables auth (RBAC). Versions 3.4.26 and 3.5.9 fix this issue. There are no known workarounds. |
| Vitess is a database clustering system for horizontal scaling of MySQL through generalized sharding. Prior to version 16.0.2, users can either intentionally or inadvertently create a shard containing `/` characters from VTAdmin such that from that point on, anyone who tries to create a new shard from VTAdmin will receive an error. Attempting to view the keyspace(s) will also no longer work. Creating a shard using `vtctldclient` does not have the same problem because the CLI validates the input correctly. Version 16.0.2, corresponding to version 0.16.2 of the `go` module, contains a patch for this issue. Some workarounds are available. Always use `vtctldclient` to create shards, instead of using VTAdmin; disable creating shards from VTAdmin using RBAC; and/or delete the topology record for the offending shard using the client for your topology server. |
|
A cross site request forgery vulnerability exists in Rockwell Automation's FactoryTalk Vantagepoint. This vulnerability can be exploited in two ways. If an attacker sends a malicious link to a computer that is on the same domain as the FactoryTalk Vantagepoint server and a user clicks the link, the attacker could impersonate the legitimate user and send requests to the affected product. Additionally, if an attacker sends an untrusted link to a computer that is not on the same domain as the server and a user opens the FactoryTalk Vantagepoint website, enters credentials for the FactoryTalk Vantagepoint server, and clicks on the malicious link a cross site request forgery attack would be successful as well.
|
