| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| There are vulnerabilities in the Soft AP Daemon Service which could allow a threat actor to execute an unauthenticated RCE attack. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise. |
| The specific API in TCBServiSign Windows Version from CHANGING Information Technology does not properly validate server-side input. When a user visits a spoofed website, unauthenticated remote attackers can cause the TCBServiSign to load a DLL from an arbitrary path. |
| The specific API in TCBServiSign Windows Version from CHANGING Information Technology does not properly validate server-side input. When a user visits a spoofed website, unauthenticated remote attackers can modify the `HKEY_CURRENT_USER` registry to execute arbitrary commands. |
| An Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Zscaler Client Connector on MacOS allows OS Command Injection. This issue affects Zscaler Client Connector on MacOS <4.2. |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Safe Browsing in Google Chrome prior to 127.0.6533.72 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to bypass discretionary access control via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE is marked as INVALID and not a bug |
| Non Security Issue. See the binutils security policy for more details, https://sourceware.org/cgit/binutils-gdb/tree/binutils/SECURITY.txt |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This CVE has been rejected as it was incorrectly assigned. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-11813. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2018-11813. Notes: All CVE users should reference [ID] instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-3739. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2018-3739. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-3739 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |