| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Expr is an expression language and expression evaluation for Go. Prior to version 1.17.7, several builtin functions in Expr, including `flatten`, `min`, `max`, `mean`, and `median`, perform recursive traversal over user-provided data structures without enforcing a maximum recursion depth. If the evaluation environment contains deeply nested or cyclic data structures, these functions may recurse indefinitely until exceed the Go runtime stack limit. This results in a stack overflow panic, causing the host application to crash. While exploitability depends on whether an attacker can influence or inject cyclic or pathologically deep data into the
evaluation environment, this behavior represents a denial-of-service (DoS) risk and affects overall library robustness. Instead of returning a recoverable evaluation error, the process may terminate unexpectedly. In affected versions, evaluation of expressions that invoke certain builtin functions on untrusted or insufficiently validated data structures can lead to a process-level crash due to stack exhaustion. This issue is most relevant in scenarios where Expr is used to evaluate expressions against externally supplied or dynamically constructed environments; cyclic references (directly or indirectly) can be introduced into arrays, maps, or structs; and there are no application-level safeguards preventing deeply nested input data. In typical use cases with controlled, acyclic data, the issue may not manifest. However, when present, the resulting panic can be used to reliably crash the application, constituting a denial of service. The issue has been fixed in the v1.17.7 versions of Expr. The patch introduces a maximum recursion depth limit for affected builtin functions. When this limit is exceeded, evaluation aborts gracefully and returns a descriptive error instead of panicking. Additionally, the maximum depth can be customized by users via `builtin.MaxDepth`, allowing applications with legitimate deep structures to raise the limit in a controlled manner. Users are strongly encouraged to upgrade to the patched release, which includes both the recursion guard and comprehensive test coverage to prevent regressions. For users who cannot immediately upgrade, some mitigations are recommended. Ensure that evaluation environments cannot contain cyclic references, validate or sanitize externally supplied data structures before passing them to Expr, and/or wrap expression evaluation with panic recovery to prevent a full process crash (as a last-resort defensive measure). These workarounds reduce risk but do not fully eliminate the issue without the patch. |
| SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue. |
| Moodle 3.10.3 contains a persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability in the calendar event subtitle field that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts. Attackers can craft a calendar event with malicious JavaScript in the subtitle track label to execute arbitrary code when users view the event. |
| A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete." |
| TP-Link Archer C50 V3 devices before Build 200318 Rel. 62209 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HTTP Header containing an unexpected Referer field. |
| 2N Access Commander application version 3.4.2 and prior returns HTTP 500 Internal Server Error responses when receiving malformed or manipulated requests, indicating improper handling of invalid input and potential security or availability impacts. |
| A Stored HTML Injection vulnerability was discovered in the CMC's Sensor Map functionality due to improper validation on connected Guardians' properties.
A malicious authenticated user with administrator privileges on a Guardian connected to a CMC can edit the Guardian's properties to inject HTML tags. If the Sensor Map functionality is enabled in the CMC, when a victim CMC user interacts with it, then the injected HTML may render in their browser, enabling phishing and possibly open redirect attacks. Full XSS exploitation and direct information disclosure are prevented by the existing input validation and Content Security Policy configuration. |
| Insecure permissions in App-Auto-Patch v3.4.2 create a race condition which allows attackers to write arbitrary files. |
| API endpoint for user synchronization in 2N Access Commander version 3.4.1 did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for OS command injection.
This vulnerability can only be exploited after authenticating with administrator privileges. |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the WindowContext parameter of /Mondo/lang/sys/Forms/MAI/compose.aspx. The WindowContext value is not properly sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected within a <script> context in the JavaScript variable window.location, allowing an attacker to break out of the existing script and inject arbitrary JavaScript. A remote attacker can supply a crafted payload that terminates the existing ProcessContextSwitchResult() function, inserts attacker-controlled script, and comments out remaining code, leading to script execution in a victim’s browser when the victim visits a malicious link or attempts to send an email. Successful exploitation can redirect victims to malicious sites, steal non-HttpOnly cookies, inject arbitrary HTML or CSS, and perform actions as the authenticated user. |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Failed parameter of /Mondo/lang/sys/Forms/MAI/AddRecipientsResult.aspx. The Failed value is not properly sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected in the response, allowing an attacker to break out of existing markup and inject arbitrary script. A remote attacker can supply a crafted payload that closes an existing HTML list element, inserts attacker-controlled JavaScript, and comments out remaining code, leading to script execution in a victim’s browser when the victim visits a malicious link. Successful exploitation can redirect victims to malicious sites, steal non-HttpOnly cookies, inject arbitrary HTML or CSS, and perform actions as the authenticated user. |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Added parameter of /Mondo/lang/sys/Forms/MAI/AddRecipientsResult.aspx. The Added value is not properly sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected in the response, allowing an attacker to break out of existing markup and inject arbitrary script. A remote attacker can supply a crafted payload that closes an existing HTML list element, inserts attacker-controlled JavaScript, and comments out remaining code, leading to script execution in a victim’s browser when the victim visits a malicious link. Successful exploitation can redirect victims to malicious sites, steal non-HttpOnly cookies, inject arbitrary HTML or CSS, and perform actions as the authenticated user. |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the theme parameter of /Mondo/lang/sys/Forms/Statistics.aspx. The theme value is insufficiently sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected in the response, allowing an attacker to break out of an existing iframe context and inject arbitrary script. A remote attacker can supply a crafted payload that closes the iframe tag, inserts attacker-controlled JavaScript, and comments out remaining code, leading to script execution in a victim’s browser when the victim visits a malicious link. Successful exploitation can redirect victims to malicious sites, steal non-HttpOnly cookies, inject arbitrary HTML or CSS, and perform actions as the authenticated user. |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Id parameter of /Mobile/ContactDetails.aspx. The Id value is not properly sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected within a <script> block in the response. By supplying a crafted payload that terminates an existing JavaScript function, inserts attacker-controlled script, and comments out remaining code, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim’s browser when the victim opens a malicious link. Successful exploitation can redirect victims to malicious sites, steal cookies not protected by HttpOnly, inject arbitrary HTML or CSS, and perform actions as the authenticated user. |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the InstanceScope parameter of /Mondo/lang/sys/Forms/CAL/compose.aspx. The InstanceScope value is not properly sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected inside a <script> block in the JavaScript variable var gInstanceScope. By supplying a crafted payload that terminates the existing PageLoad() function, inserts attacker-controlled script, and comments out remaining code, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim’s browser. Successful exploitation can redirect victims to malicious sites, steal non-HttpOnly cookies, inject arbitrary HTML or CSS, and perform actions as the authenticated user. |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the FieldTo parameter of /Mondo/lang/sys/Forms/AddressBook.aspx. The FieldTo value is not properly sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected inside a <script> block in the JavaScript variable var fieldTo. By supplying a crafted payload that terminates the existing Finish() function, inserts attacker-controlled script, and comments out remaining code, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim’s browser when the victim attempts to send an email. Successful exploitation can redirect victims to malicious sites, steal non-HttpOnly cookies, inject arbitrary HTML or CSS, and perform actions as the authenticated user. |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the FieldCc parameter of /Mondo/lang/sys/Forms/AddressBook.aspx. The FieldCc value is not properly sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected inside a <script> block in the JavaScript variable var CCFieldProvided. By supplying a crafted payload that terminates the existing LoadCurAddresses() function, inserts attacker-controlled script, and comments out remaining code, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim’s browser when the victim attempts to send an email. Successful exploitation can redirect victims to malicious sites, steal non-HttpOnly cookies, inject arbitrary HTML or CSS, and perform actions as the authenticated user. |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the FieldBcc parameter of /Mondo/lang/sys/Forms/AddressBook.aspx. The FieldBcc value is not properly sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected inside a <script> block in the JavaScript variable var BCCFieldProvided. By supplying a crafted payload that terminates the existing LoadCurAddresses() function, inserts attacker-controlled script, and comments out remaining code, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim’s browser during normal email composition. Successful exploitation can redirect victims to malicious sites, steal non-HttpOnly cookies, inject arbitrary HTML or CSS, and perform actions as the authenticated user. |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the AddressesTo parameter of /Mondo/lang/sys/Forms/AddressBook.aspx. The AddressesTo value is not properly sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected within a <script> block in the response. By supplying a crafted payload that terminates the existing JavaScript function, inserts attacker-controlled script, and comments out remaining code, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim’s browser when the victim attempts to send an email. Successful exploitation can redirect victims to malicious sites, steal non-HttpOnly cookies, inject arbitrary HTML or CSS, and perform actions as the authenticated user. |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the AddressesCc parameter of /Mondo/lang/sys/Forms/AddressBook.aspx. The AddressesCc value is not properly sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected within a <script> block in the JavaScript variable var sAddrCc. By supplying a crafted payload that terminates the existing LoadCurAddresses() function, inserts attacker-controlled script, and comments out remaining code, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim’s browser when the victim attempts to send an email. Successful exploitation can redirect victims to malicious sites, steal non-HttpOnly cookies, inject arbitrary HTML or CSS, and perform actions as the authenticated user. |
