Total
11282 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-28064 | 1 Dell | 140 Alienware M15 R6, Alienware M15 R6 Firmware, Alienware M15 R7 and 137 more | 2024-11-07 | 3.5 Low |
| Dell BIOS contains an Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability. An unauthenticated physical attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24188 | 1 Jsish | 1 Jsish | 2024-11-07 | 9.8 Critical |
| Jsish v3.5.0 was discovered to contain a heap-buffer-overflow in ./src/jsiUtils.c. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38410 | 1 Qualcomm | 51 Fastconnect 6700, Fastconnect 6700 Firmware, Fastconnect 6900 and 48 more | 2024-11-07 | 7.8 High |
| Memory corruption while IOCLT is called when device is in invalid state and the WMI command buffer may be freed twice. | ||||
| CVE-2023-37375 | 1 Siemens | 1 Tecnomatix | 2024-11-07 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2201 (All versions < V2201.0008), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2302 (All versions < V2302.0002). The affected application is vulnerable to stack-based buffer overflow while parsing specially crafted SPP files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-21060) | ||||
| CVE-2024-23798 | 1 Siemens | 1 Tecnomatix Plant Simulation | 2024-11-07 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2201 (All versions < V2201.0012), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2302 (All versions < V2302.0006). The affected applications contain a stack overflow vulnerability while parsing specially crafted WRL files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24920 | 1 Siemens | 1 Simcenter Femap | 2024-11-07 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2401.0000). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing a specially crafted Catia MODEL file. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-21710) | ||||
| CVE-2023-2072 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 2 Powermonitor 1000, Powermonitor 1000 Firmware | 2024-11-07 | 8.8 High |
| The Rockwell Automation PowerMonitor 1000 contains stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities within the web page of the product. The vulnerable pages do not require privileges to access and can be injected with code by an attacker which could be used to leverage an attack on an authenticated user resulting in remote code execution and potentially the complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the product. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8587 | 1 Autodesk | 8 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 5 more | 2024-11-07 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file when parsed in odxsw_dll.dll through Autodesk AutoCAD can force a Heap Based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, write sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2022-48998 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2024-11-07 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/bpf/32: Fix Oops on tail call tests test_bpf tail call tests end up as: test_bpf: #0 Tail call leaf jited:1 85 PASS test_bpf: #1 Tail call 2 jited:1 111 PASS test_bpf: #2 Tail call 3 jited:1 145 PASS test_bpf: #3 Tail call 4 jited:1 170 PASS test_bpf: #4 Tail call load/store leaf jited:1 190 PASS test_bpf: #5 Tail call load/store jited:1 BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on write at 0xf1b4e000 Faulting instruction address: 0xbe86b710 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] BE PAGE_SIZE=4K MMU=Hash PowerMac Modules linked in: test_bpf(+) CPU: 0 PID: 97 Comm: insmod Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4+ #195 Hardware name: PowerMac3,1 750CL 0x87210 PowerMac NIP: be86b710 LR: be857e88 CTR: be86b704 REGS: f1b4df20 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (6.1.0-rc4+) MSR: 00009032 <EE,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 28008242 XER: 00000000 DAR: f1b4e000 DSISR: 42000000 GPR00: 00000001 f1b4dfe0 c11d2280 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 GPR08: f1b4e000 be86b704 f1b4e000 00000000 00000000 100d816a f2440000 fe73baa8 GPR16: f2458000 00000000 c1941ae4 f1fe2248 00000045 c0de0000 f2458030 00000000 GPR24: 000003e8 0000000f f2458000 f1b4dc90 3e584b46 00000000 f24466a0 c1941a00 NIP [be86b710] 0xbe86b710 LR [be857e88] __run_one+0xec/0x264 [test_bpf] Call Trace: [f1b4dfe0] [00000002] 0x2 (unreliable) Instruction dump: XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- This is a tentative to write above the stack. The problem is encoutered with tests added by commit 38608ee7b690 ("bpf, tests: Add load store test case for tail call") This happens because tail call is done to a BPF prog with a different stack_depth. At the time being, the stack is kept as is when the caller tail calls its callee. But at exit, the callee restores the stack based on its own properties. Therefore here, at each run, r1 is erroneously increased by 32 - 16 = 16 bytes. This was done that way in order to pass the tail call count from caller to callee through the stack. As powerpc32 doesn't have a red zone in the stack, it was necessary the maintain the stack as is for the tail call. But it was not anticipated that the BPF frame size could be different. Let's take a new approach. Use register r4 to carry the tail call count during the tail call, and save it into the stack at function entry if required. This means the input parameter must be in r3, which is more correct as it is a 32 bits parameter, then tail call better match with normal BPF function entry, the down side being that we move that input parameter back and forth between r3 and r4. That can be optimised later. Doing that also has the advantage of maximising the common parts between tail calls and a normal function exit. With the fix, tail call tests are now successfull: test_bpf: #0 Tail call leaf jited:1 53 PASS test_bpf: #1 Tail call 2 jited:1 115 PASS test_bpf: #2 Tail call 3 jited:1 154 PASS test_bpf: #3 Tail call 4 jited:1 165 PASS test_bpf: #4 Tail call load/store leaf jited:1 101 PASS test_bpf: #5 Tail call load/store jited:1 141 PASS test_bpf: #6 Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 994 PASS test_bpf: #7 Tail call count preserved across function calls jited:1 140975 PASS test_bpf: #8 Tail call error path, NULL target jited:1 110 PASS test_bpf: #9 Tail call error path, index out of range jited:1 69 PASS test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 10 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [10/10 JIT'ed] | ||||
| CVE-2024-51510 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2024-11-07 | 7.6 High |
| Out-of-bounds access vulnerability in the logo module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3596 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 6 1756-en4tr, 1756-en4tr Firmware, 1756-en4trk and 3 more | 2024-11-07 | 7.5 High |
| Where this vulnerability exists in the Rockwell Automation 1756-EN4* Ethernet/IP communication products, it could allow a malicious user to cause a denial of service by asserting the target system through maliciously crafted CIP messages. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33913 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 10 Android, S8000, T606 and 7 more | 2024-11-07 | 7.2 High |
| In DRM/oemcrypto, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect calculation of buffer size.This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed | ||||
| CVE-2023-1901 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2024-11-07 | 5.9 Medium |
| The bluetooth HCI host layer logic not clearing a global reference to a semaphore after synchronously sending HCI commands may allow a malicious HCI Controller to cause the use of a dangling reference in the host layer, leading to a crash (DoS) or potential RCE on the Host layer. | ||||
| CVE-2023-20802 | 3 Google, Linuxfoundation, Mediatek | 9 Android, Yocto, Mt6879 and 6 more | 2024-11-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| In imgsys, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07420968; Issue ID: ALPS07420976. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7674 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Navisworks | 2024-11-07 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted DWF file, when parsed in dwfcore.dll through Autodesk Navisworks, can force a Heap-based Buffer Overflow. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7673 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Navisworks | 2024-11-07 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted DWFX file, when parsed in w3dtk.dll through Autodesk Navisworks, can force a Heap-based Buffer Overflow. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7672 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Navisworks | 2024-11-07 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted DWF file, when parsed in dwfcore.dll through Autodesk Navisworks, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, write sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7671 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Navisworks | 2024-11-07 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted DWFX file, when parsed in dwfcore.dll through Autodesk Navisworks, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, write sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45185 | 2024-11-06 | 5.1 Medium | ||
| An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor, Wearable Processor, and Modem Exynos 9820, 9825, 980, 990, 850, 1080, 2100, 1280, 2200, 1330, 1380, 1480, 2400, 9110, W920, W930, Modem 5123, Modem 5300. There is an out-of-bounds write due to a heap overflow in the GPRS protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2021-34704 | 1 Cisco | 2 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firepower Threat Defense | 2024-11-06 | 8.6 High |
| A vulnerability in the web services interface of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation when parsing HTTPS requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious HTTPS request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. | ||||