Total
583 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-14246 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the convertTocPDF method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. The attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6009. | ||||
| CVE-2018-12453 | 1 Redislabs | 1 Redis | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| Type confusion in the xgroupCommand function in t_stream.c in redis-server in Redis before 5.0 allows remote attackers to cause denial-of-service via an XGROUP command in which the key is not a stream. | ||||
| CVE-2018-12386 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Mozilla and 1 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Firefox and 8 more | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in register allocation in JavaScript can lead to type confusion, allowing for an arbitrary read and write. This leads to remote code execution inside the sandboxed content process when triggered. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 60.2.2 and Firefox < 62.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11623 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the addAdLayer method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. The attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6003. | ||||
| CVE-2018-10495 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF documents. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5586. | ||||
| CVE-2018-8298 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Chakracore | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8242, CVE-2018-8283, CVE-2018-8287, CVE-2018-8288, CVE-2018-8291, CVE-2018-8296. | ||||
| CVE-2018-8384 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Chakracore | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8266, CVE-2018-8380, CVE-2018-8381. | ||||
| CVE-2018-8291 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Chakracore, Edge, Internet Explorer and 7 more | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore, Internet Explorer 11, Microsoft Edge. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8242, CVE-2018-8283, CVE-2018-8287, CVE-2018-8288, CVE-2018-8296, CVE-2018-8298. | ||||
| CVE-2018-8279 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly accesses objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Edge Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8125, CVE-2018-8262, CVE-2018-8274, CVE-2018-8275, CVE-2018-8301. | ||||
| CVE-2018-8229 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 1 more | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8227. | ||||
| CVE-2018-8133 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Chakracore, Edge | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0943, CVE-2018-8130, CVE-2018-8145, CVE-2018-8177. | ||||
| CVE-2018-6122 | 2 Google, Redhat | 2 Chrome, Rhel Extras | 2024-08-05 | 8.8 High |
| Type confusion in WebAssembly in Google Chrome prior to 66.0.3359.139 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2018-4944 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 11 Flash Player, Macos, Chrome Os and 8 more | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 29.0.0.140 and earlier have an exploitable type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. | ||||
| CVE-2018-4920 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 9 Flash Player, Flash Player Desktop Runtime, Mac Os X and 6 more | 2024-08-05 | 8.8 High |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 28.0.0.161 and earlier have an exploitable type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19391 | 2 Luajit, Moonjit Project | 2 Luajit, Moonjit | 2024-08-05 | 9.1 Critical |
| In LuaJIT through 2.0.5, as used in Moonjit before 2.1.2 and other products, debug.getinfo has a type confusion issue that leads to arbitrary memory write or read operations, because certain cases involving valid stack levels and > options are mishandled. NOTE: The LuaJIT project owner states that the debug libary is unsafe by definition and that this is not a vulnerability. When LuaJIT was originally developed, the expectation was that the entire debug library had no security guarantees and thus it made no sense to assign CVEs. However, not all users of later LuaJIT derivatives share this perspective | ||||
| CVE-2019-25010 | 1 Failure Project | 1 Failure | 2024-08-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in the failure crate through 2019-11-13 for Rust. Type confusion can occur when __private_get_type_id__ is overridden. | ||||
| CVE-2019-20588 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-08-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the SEM Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14891 (August 2019). | ||||
| CVE-2019-20587 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-08-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.1) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the MLDAP Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14867 (August 2019). | ||||
| CVE-2019-20585 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-08-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the SEC_FR Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14851 (August 2019). | ||||
| CVE-2019-20589 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-08-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the SKPM Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14892 (August 2019). | ||||