Total
263485 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2007-3900 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2007-3894 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2007-3802 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0447. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0447. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0447 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-3801 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3699. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3699. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3699 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-3733 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2007-3595 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3399. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3399. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3399 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-3395 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2836. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2836. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2836 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-3125 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-6772. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-6772. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-6772 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-3090 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0591. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0591. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0591 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-3031 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2007-3005 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2789. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2789. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2789 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-3004 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2788. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2788. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2788 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-2841 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3947. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-3947. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3947 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-2653 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2438. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2438. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2438 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-2436 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1861. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-2413 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2459. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2459. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2459 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-2226 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2007-2220 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2007-2215 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2007-2056 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| The getlock function in aimage/aimage.cpp in AFFLIB 2.2.8 and earlier allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary lock files (aka "time-of-check-time-of-use file race"). NOTE: the researcher has retracted the original advisory, stating that "the portion of vulnerable code is not called in any current version of AFFLIB and is therefore not exploitable. | ||||