| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 | 
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3399.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3399.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3399 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2836.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2836.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2836 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-6772.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-6772.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-6772 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0591.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0591.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0591 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2789.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2789.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2789 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2788.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2788.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2788 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3947. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-3947. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3947 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2438.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2438.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2438 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1861.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1861.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1861 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2459.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2459.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2459 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | 
    
    
    
        | The getlock function in aimage/aimage.cpp in AFFLIB 2.2.8 and earlier allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary lock files (aka "time-of-check-time-of-use file race"). NOTE: the researcher has retracted the original advisory, stating that "the portion of vulnerable code is not called in any current version of AFFLIB and is therefore not exploitable. | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1685.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1685.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1685 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1873.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1873.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1873 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | 
    
    
    
        | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none |