Search Results (29905 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-34117 1 Guardian 1 Language-system 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
Guardian language-system passes the id GET parameter directly into a PHP exec() call in text_to_subtitles.php (line 19) without sanitization: exec(\"php jobs/text_to_subtitles.php \".$login_session.\" \".$_GET['id'].\" ...\"). No authentication is required. An unauthenticated remote attacker can append shell metacharacters to execute arbitrary OS commands on the server.
CVE-2026-57677 2 Novalnet, Wordpress 2 Novalnet Payment Gateway For Woocommerce, Wordpress 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in Novalnet Payment Gateway for WooCommerce <= 12.10.3 versions.
CVE-2026-57683 2 Epsiloncool, Wordpress 2 Wp Fast Total Search, Wordpress 2026-07-06 9.3 Critical
Unauthenticated SQL Injection in WP Fast Total Search <= 1.80.280 versions.
CVE-2026-58455 1 Notifiarr 1 Dockwatch 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
Dockwatch through 0.6.567 contains an unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands by exploiting a missing exit() after an authentication redirect in loader.php combined with unsanitized input passed to shell_exec() in ajax/compose.php. Attackers can seed the required session flag through the incomplete auth check, then inject arbitrary commands via the composePath POST parameter in the composePull action to achieve full host compromise, facilitated by the standard deployment mounting of the Docker socket.
CVE-2024-14037 1 Redsea Cloud 1 Ehr 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
Redsea Cloud eHR contains an arbitrary file upload vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to achieve remote code execution by uploading malicious files through the PtFjk.mob servlet endpoint. Attackers can submit a multipart POST request with a JSP webshell disguised using a spoofed image/jpeg Content-Type to bypass the absence of extension and MIME type validation, with the uploaded file stored at a predictable path under the uploadfile directory and executed directly by the web server. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-11-03 (UTC).
CVE-2022-50973 1 Yonyou 1 Ksoa 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
Yonyou KSOA 9.0 contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file upload vulnerability in the com.sksoft.bill.ImageUpload servlet that allows unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files by submitting a POST request with attacker-controlled filepath and filename parameters without any authentication, file type, extension, or content validation. Attackers can upload a JSP webshell by specifying a malicious filename and root filepath, with the uploaded file stored under the pictures directory and directly executed by the web server, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2023-11-07 (UTC).
CVE-2026-57100 1 Microsoft 2 Entra Provisioning Service, Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service 2026-07-06 9.9 Critical
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service (SyncFabric) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
CVE-2026-9725 2 Printcart, Wordpress 2 Printcart Web To Print Product Designer For Woocommerce, Wordpress 2026-07-06 9.1 Critical
The Printcart Web to Print Product Designer for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Deletion in versions up to, and including, 2.5.2 This is due to insufficient path validation in the store_design_data() function, which constructs a filesystem path from the user-supplied 'nbd_item_key' POST parameter sanitized only with sanitize_text_field() — which does not strip path traversal sequences — and then passes that path directly to Nbdesigner_IO::delete_folder() and PHP's rename(). The nonce protecting the nbd_save_customer_design AJAX action is freely obtainable by unauthenticated users via the nbd_check_use_logged_in endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible.
CVE-2026-4321 1 Raera 1 Destekz 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in Raera - Ankara Web Design and Digital Advertising Agency Destekz allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Destekz: through 02062026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted and it was learned that the product is not supported.
CVE-2026-56015 1 Tpoder 1 Net::ip::lpm 2026-07-06 9.1 Critical
Net::IP::LPM versions through 1.10 for Perl allow a heap out-of-bounds read via an unbounded prefix length. add() passes the prefix string to the trie builder addPrefixToTrie() without checking it against the address width. addPrefixToTrie() then walks the prefix buffer by prefix_length bits, reading prefix[byte] for byte up to prefix_len/8, where prefix is the 4-byte (IPv4) or 16-byte (IPv6) packed address. A prefix length greater than 32 for IPv4 or 128 for IPv6, for example add("1.2.3.4/255", $v) or add("2001:db8::/255", $v), reads past the end of the packed address. The out-of-bounds read happens during trie construction and is bounded: the prefix length is stored as an unsigned char, so the bit walk reads at most 32 bytes from the start of the packed address, a short distance past the end of the 4-byte or 16-byte buffer. It is detectable under AddressSanitizer, valgrind, or a hardened allocator, where it can abort the process. Lookups and dump() format only the valid address width, so the out-of-bounds bytes are not exposed through the module's API.
CVE-2026-20706 1 Gitea 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server 2026-07-06 9.1 Critical
Gitea versions up to and including 1.26.1 allow repository archive downloads to bypass token scope checks on the web archive download endpoint.
CVE-2026-27780 1 Gitea 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
Gitea versions before 1.26.0 do not fail closed on bufio.Scanner errors while processing pre-receive hook input, allowing oversized input to bypass branch-protection checks.
CVE-2026-12481 2 Keras, Keras-team 2 Keras, Keras 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
A vulnerability in keras-team/keras version 3.14.0 allows for arbitrary code execution due to improper handling of deserialization in the `Lambda` layer. Specifically, the `_raise_for_lambda_deserialization()` function fails to enforce the safe-mode guard when `safe_mode` is set to `None`, which is the default value when `from_config()` is called outside of a `SafeModeScope` context. This logic error conflates `None` (unset/default-deny) with `False` (explicitly disabled), bypassing the guard and allowing attacker-controlled `marshal` bytecode to be deserialized. Affected call sites include `keras.layers.deserialize(config)`, `keras.models.clone_model(model)`, and any direct invocation of `Lambda.from_config(config)` without an enclosing `SafeModeScope(True)`. This vulnerability can be exploited to achieve arbitrary OS-level code execution in the context of the server or user process.
CVE-2026-58422 1 Gitea 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
Improper authorization on OAuth sign-in callback silently re-enables administrator-disabled accounts
CVE-2026-58426 1 Gitea 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server 2026-07-06 9.6 Critical
Gitea Actions Artifacts V4 signed URL HMAC ambiguity allows cross-repository artifact read and cross-task upload-state write
CVE-2026-14807 1 Prog Mis 1 Erp App 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
ERP App developed by PROG MIS has a Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to log in to view application code and obtain the database account and password.
CVE-2026-46455 1 Apache 1 Camel 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability in Apache Camel Keycloak Component. The camel-keycloak security helper KeycloakSecurityHelper.parseAndVerifyAccessToken builds a Keycloak TokenVerifier using withChecks(...) with only the subject-exists check and the realm-URL (issuer) check. Keycloak's TokenVerifier.withChecks(...) appends to an initially empty check list - the upstream default checks are installed only when withDefaultChecks() is called - so the built-in IS_ACTIVE predicate, which validates the token's exp (expiration) and nbf (not-before) claims, is never applied. As a result the helper verifies the token signature, subject and issuer but does not enforce the token's validity window: an access token that is expired, or not yet valid, is accepted as valid. Routes that rely on this helper to authenticate inbound requests therefore accept access tokens that are outside their intended lifetime. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.18.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. The fix makes KeycloakSecurityHelper.parseAndVerifyAccessToken include the TokenVerifier.IS_ACTIVE check so that expired or not-yet-valid access tokens are rejected, aligning the helper with Keycloak's default check set. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, enforce token expiration outside the helper - for example validate the access token's exp/nbf claims in the route before trusting it, keep Keycloak access-token lifetimes short, and ensure any upstream gateway or resource server also validates the token validity window.
CVE-2026-48205 1 Apache 2 Camel, Camel Dns 2026-07-06 9.1 Critical
Improper Input Validation, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel DNS component. The camel-dns producers read DNS operation parameters - the resolver to query, the name or domain to look up, the record type and class, and the search term - from Exchange message headers whose constant values (DnsConstants.DNS_SERVER, DNS_NAME, DNS_DOMAIN, DNS_TYPE, DNS_CLASS, TERM) were the plain strings dns.server, dns.name, dns.domain, dns.type, dns.class and term. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a dns: producer, any HTTP client could therefore set the dns.server header to make the dig producer build a SimpleResolver pointing at an attacker-controlled DNS server - a server-side request forgery via DNS, through which the attacker observes the queried name and can return poisoned responses - and set the dns.name / dns.domain headers to resolve arbitrary internal hostnames, disclosing whether they exist (internal network reconnaissance). No credentials are required when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that drive DNS operations via the raw header names must use CamelDnsServer / CamelDnsName / CamelDnsDomain / CamelDnsType / CamelDnsClass / CamelDnsTerm instead of the dns.* / term names. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the dns.* and term headers from any untrusted ingress before the dns: producer, and set the DNS server and lookup parameters from a trusted source in the route.
CVE-2026-56140 1 Apache 2 Camel, Camel Aws2 Sns 2026-07-06 9.8 Critical
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel AWS SNS component. The camel-aws2-sns component filters Camel headers through a component-specific HeaderFilterStrategy, Sns2HeaderFilterStrategy. Like the sibling Sqs2HeaderFilterStrategy, it originally configured only an outbound filter (setOutFilterPattern, which blocks Camel*, breadcrumbId and org.apache.camel.* headers from being written out) and did not configure an inbound filter rule. For the related camel-aws2-sqs component this inbound gap was exploitable, because the Sqs2Consumer maps inbound SQS message attributes into the Camel Exchange via HeaderFilterStrategy.applyFilterToExternalHeaders, allowing a message sender to inject Camel control headers (tracked as CVE-2026-46456). camel-aws2-sns, by contrast, is producer-only: Sns2Endpoint does not support consumers (createConsumer throws UnsupportedOperationException, 'You cannot receive messages from this endpoint'), so no externally-supplied message attributes are ever mapped inbound into a Camel Exchange through SNS, and the missing inbound filter rule on Sns2HeaderFilterStrategy was therefore not reachable by an attacker. As part of the same fix (CAMEL-23506), an inbound filter rule (setInFilterStartsWith for the Camel namespace) was added to Sns2HeaderFilterStrategy so that its configuration matches the corrected Sqs2HeaderFilterStrategy and the other sibling strategies. This is a defense-in-depth alignment with no known exploit path in camel-aws2-sns. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. This is a defense-in-depth hardening change with no known exploit path in camel-aws2-sns, which is producer-only, so no urgent action or workaround is required. Users who want the aligned behaviour can upgrade to version 4.21.0, or to 4.14.8 on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, or to 4.18.3 on the 4.18.x releases stream, which contain the change. As a general best practice, operators should continue to apply least-privilege IAM permissions on their SNS topics.
CVE-2026-12686 1 Adiss 1 Biloop 2026-07-06 N/A
An authenticated user could manipulate a company ID parameter in a POST request to the backend to gain unauthorised access to other companies hosted within the same subdomain environment. The application does not adequately verify whether the requested company ID belongs to the authenticated user’s session, resulting in a cross-tenant authorisation bypass. If this vulnerability is successfully exploited, it allows unauthorised access to sensitive customer information, including billing data, and may enable the unauthorised modification of third-party data.