| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the HDCP Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14850 (August 2019). |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the EXT_FR Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14847 (August 2019). |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with P(9.0) software. The MemorySaver Content Provider allows SQL injection. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14365 (August 2019). |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with N(7.x), O(8.x), and P(9.0) software. There is local SQL injection in the Wi-Fi history Content Provider. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14061 (August 2019). |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with N(7.x), O(8.x), and P(9.0) software. There is local SQL injection in the RCS Content Provider. The Samsung IDs are SVE-2019-14059, SVE-2019-14685 (August 2019). |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the WVDRM Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14885 (September 2019). |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with N(7.x) software. The Gallery app allows attackers to view all pictures of a locked device. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-15189 (October 2019). |
| Jobberbase 2.0 has SQL injection via the PATH_INFO to the jobs-in endpoint. |
| In Jp2Image::readMetadata() in jp2image.cpp in Exiv2 0.27.2, an input file can result in an infinite loop and hang, with high CPU consumption. Remote attackers could leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service via a crafted file. |
| The ConfigureBambooRelease resource in Jira Software and Jira Software Data Center before version 8.6.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to view release version information in projects that they do not have access to through an missing authorisation check. |
| There was a flaw in the WordPress plugin, Email Subscribers & Newsletters before 4.3.1, that allowed SQL statements to be passed to the database in the hash parameter (a blind SQL injection vulnerability). |
| In PHP Scripts Mall advanced-real-estate-script 4.0.9, the news_edit.php news_id parameter is vulnerable to SQL Injection. |
| D-Link DIR-859 routers before v1.07b03_beta allow Unauthenticated Information Disclosure via the AUTHORIZED_GROUP=1%0a value, as demonstrated by vpnconfig.php. |
| An issue was discovered in ezXML 0.8.3 through 0.8.6. The ezxml_parse_* functions mishandle XML entities, leading to an infinite loop in which memory allocations occur. |
| SOPlanning 1.45 has SQL injection via the user_list.php "by" parameter. |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in TestLink through 1.9.19 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) tproject_id parameter to keywordsView.php; the (2) req_spec_id parameter to reqSpecCompareRevisions.php; the (3) requirement_id parameter to reqCompareVersions.php; the (4) build_id parameter to planUpdateTC.php; the (5) tplan_id parameter to newest_tcversions.php; the (6) tplan_id parameter to tcCreatedPerUserGUI.php; the (7) tcase_id parameter to tcAssign2Tplan.php; or the (8) testcase_id parameter to tcCompareVersions.php. Authentication is often easy to achieve: a guest account, that can execute this attack, can be created by anyone in the default configuration. |
| payment_manage.ajax.php and various *_manage.ajax.php in MFScripts YetiShare 3.5.2 through 4.5.4 directly insert values from the sSortDir_0 parameter into a SQL string. This allows an attacker to inject their own SQL and manipulate the query, typically extracting data from the database, aka SQL Injection. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-19732. |
| A vulnerability in the web management interface of Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to upload arbitrary files. The vulnerability is due to incomplete authorization checks in the web management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious request to certain parts of the web management interface. Depending on the configuration of the affected switch, the malicious request must be sent via HTTP or HTTPS. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to modify the configuration of an affected device or to inject a reverse shell. This vulnerability affects Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches running firmware versions prior to 1.1.4.4 with the web management interface enabled. The web management interface is enabled via both HTTP and HTTPS by default. |
| A vulnerability in the internal packet-processing functionality of the Cisco StarOS operating system running on virtual platforms could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to stop processing traffic, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to a logic error that may occur under specific traffic conditions. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a series of crafted packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to prevent the targeted service interface from receiving any traffic, which would lead to a DoS condition on the affected interface. The device may have to be manually reloaded to recover from exploitation of this vulnerability. |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Infrastructure (PI) and Cisco Evolved Programmable Network (EPN) Manager could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL queries. This vulnerability exist because the software improperly validates user-supplied input in SQL queries. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request that contains malicious SQL statements to the affected application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view or modify entries in some database tables, affecting the integrity of the data. |
