| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Simple Sticky Footer plugin before 1.3.3 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change plugin settings via unspecified vectors or conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the (2) simple_sf_width or (3) simple_sf_style parameter in the simple-simple-sticky-footer page to wp-admin/themes.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on Cisco TelePresence IP VCR devices with software 3.0(1.27) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuu90736. |
| Fat Free CRM before 0.13.6 allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a request without the authenticity_token, as demonstrated by a crafted HTML page that creates a new administrator account. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Wing FTP Server before 4.4.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) execute arbitrary code via a crafted request to admin_lua_script.html or (2) add a domain administrator via a crafted request to admin_addadmin.html. |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Bagisto before v.1.5.1 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML script. |
| CSRF tokens are generated using math/rand, which is not a cryptographically secure random number generator, allowing an attacker to predict values and bypass CSRF protections with relatively few requests. |
| A vulnerability was found in mingyuefusu 明月复苏 tushuguanlixitong 图书管理系统 up to d4836f6b49cd0ac79a4021b15ce99ff7229d4694 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Emergency Responder could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a CSRF attack, which could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient protections for the web UI of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user, such as deleting users from the device. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ShareThis ShareThis Dashboard for Google Analytics. This issue affects ShareThis Dashboard for Google Analytics: from n/a through 3.2.2. |
| Broken Access Control vulnerability in Nickolas Bossinas WordPress File Upload allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WordPress File Upload: from n/a through 4.24.7. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management interface in FreeIPA before 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that make configuration changes. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tomaz Muraus Open Blog 1.2.1, and possibly earlier, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrative password. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web console in Zenprise Device Manager 6.x through 6.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that wipe mobile devices. |
| mappy.py in Splunk Web in Splunk 4.2.x before 4.2.5 does not properly restrict use of the mappy command to access Python classes, which allows remote authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary code by leveraging the sys module in a request to the search application, as demonstrated by a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack, aka SPL-45172. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Mark Complete module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.1 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in SilverStripe 2.3.x before 2.3.9 and 2.4.x before 2.4.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via destructive controller actions, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-5087. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Blue Coat ProxyAV appliance before 3.2.6.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change a password, (2) modify a policy, or (3) restart the device. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework on Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance (WSA) devices, Email Security Appliance (ESA) devices, and Content Security Management Appliance (SMA) devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug IDs CSCuh70263, CSCuh70323, and CSCuh26634. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework on the Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuh25506. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wordpress_sentinel.php in the Sentinel plugin 1.0.0 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of an administrator for requests that trigger snapshots. |
