| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and ABAP Platform Internet Communication Manager (ICM) permits authorized users with admin privileges and local access to log files to read sensitive information, resulting in information disclosure. This leads to high impact on the confidentiality of the application, with no impact on integrity or availability. |
| SAP S/4HANA Supplier invoice is vulnerable to CRLF Injection. An attacker with user-level privileges can bypass the allowlist and insert untrusted sites into the 'Trusted Sites' configuration by injecting line feed (LF) characters into application inputs. This vulnerability has a low impact on the application's integrity and no impact on confidentiality or availability. |
| slab is a pre-allocated storage for a uniform data type. In version 0.4.10, the get_disjoint_mut method incorrectly checked if indices were within the slab's capacity instead of its length, allowing access to uninitialized memory. This could lead to undefined behavior or potential crashes. This has been fixed in slab 0.4.11. A workaround for this issue involves to avoid using get_disjoint_mut with indices that might be beyond the slab's actual length. |
| Omnissa Workspace ONE UEM contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability. A malicious actor with user privileges may be able to access restricted internal system information, potentially enabling enumeration of internal network resources. |
| CyberData 011209 Intercom could allow an unauthenticated user access to the Web Interface through an alternate path. |
| CyberData 011209 Intercom could allow an unauthenticated user to gather sensitive information through blind SQL injections. |
| CyberData 011209 Intercom
could allow an authenticated attacker to upload arbitrary files to multiple locations within the system. |
| CyberData 011209 Intercom
does not properly store or protect web server admin credentials. |
| A vulnerability has been found in JCG Link-net LW-N915R 17s.20.001.908. Affected is an unknown function of the file /wireless/basic.asp of the component Wireless Basic Settings Page. The manipulation of the argument Network Name leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. |
| The Assemblyline 4 Service Client interfaces with the API to fetch tasks and publish the result for a service in Assemblyline 4. In versions below 4.6.1.dev138, the Assemblyline 4 Service Client (task_handler.py) accepts a SHA-256 value returned by the service server and uses it directly as a local file name.A malicious or compromised server (or any MITM that can speak to client) can return a path-traversal payload such as `../../../etc/cron.d/evil` and force the client to write the downloaded bytes to an arbitrary location on disk. This is fixed in version 4.6.1.dev138. |
| A vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One (on-premise) management console could allow a pre-authenticated remote attacker to upload malicious code and execute commands on affected installations. This vulnerability is essentially the same as CVE-2025-54948 but targets a different CPU architecture. |
| OctoPrint provides a web interface for controlling consumer 3D printers. OctoPrint versions up until and including 1.11.1 contain a vulnerability that allows an attacker with the FILE_UPLOAD permission to exfiltrate files from the host that OctoPrint has read access to, by moving them into the upload folder where they then can be downloaded from. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.11.2. |
| A vulnerability classified as critical was found in CesiumLab Web up to 4.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /lodmodels/. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| OctoPrint versions up until and including 1.11.1 contain a vulnerability that allows any unauthenticated attacker to send a manipulated broken multipart/form-data request to OctoPrint and through that make the web server component become unresponsive. The issue can be triggered by a broken multipart/form-data request lacking an end boundary to any of OctoPrint's endpoints implemented through the octoprint.server.util.tornado.UploadStorageFallbackHandler request handler. The request handler will get stuck in an endless busy loop, looking for a part of the request that will never come. As Tornado is single-threaded, that will effectively block the whole web server. The vulnerability has been patched in version 1.11.2. |
| A vulnerability was found in Pagure. Support of symbolic links during repository archiving of repositories allows the disclosure of local files. This flaw allows a malicious user to take advantage of the Pagure instance. |
| A vulnerability was found in Pagure. An argument injection in Git during retrieval of the repository history leads to remote code execution on the Pagure instance. |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 12.0 before 17.10.8, 17.11 before 17.11.4, and 18.0 before 18.0.2. Under certain conditions users could bypass IP access restrictions and view sensitive information. |
| The WordPress Related Posts plugin through 3.6.4 contains an authenticated (admin+) stored XSS vulnerability in the title field on the settings page. By exploiting that an attacker will be able to execute JavaScript code in the user's browser. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in TIA Project-Server (All versions < V2.1.1), TIA Project-Server V17 (All versions), Totally Integrated Automation Portal (TIA Portal) V17 (All versions), Totally Integrated Automation Portal (TIA Portal) V18 (All versions), Totally Integrated Automation Portal (TIA Portal) V19 (All versions < V19 Update 4), Totally Integrated Automation Portal (TIA Portal) V20 (All versions < V20 Update 3). The affected application improperly handles uploaded projects in the document root. This could allow an attacker with contributor privileges to cause denial of service by uploading a malicious project. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) V9.6x (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) V9.6x (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) V9.8x (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions >= V9.50 < V9.90). Affected devices do not properly validate SNMP GET requests. This could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive information of the affected devices with SNMPv2 GET requests using default credentials. |
