| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub and other standards. This vulnerability allows a user to maneuver the Webfinger mechanism to perform a GET request to any internal resource on any Host, Port, URL combination regardless of present security mechanisms, and forcing the victim’s server into an infinite loop causing Denial of Service. Moreover, this issue can also be maneuvered into performing a Blind SSRF attack. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.14, 1.1.11, 1.2.11, and 1.3.4. |
| The Your Friendly Drag and Drop Page Builder — Make Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.10 via the make_builder_ajax_subscribe() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| Canarytokens help track activity and actions on a network. Prior to `sha-8ea5315`, Canarytokens.org was vulnerable to a blind SSRF in the Webhook alert feature. When a Canarytoken is created, users choose to receive alerts either via email or via a webhook. If a webhook is supplied when a Canarytoken is first created, the site will make a test request to the supplied URL to ensure it accepts alert notification HTTP requests. No safety checks were performed on the URL, leading to a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. The SSRF is Blind because the content of the response is not displayed to the creating user; they are simply told whether an error occurred in making the test request. Using the Blind SSRF, it was possible to map out open ports for IPs inside the Canarytokens.org infrastructure. This issue is now patched on Canarytokens.org. Users of self-hosted Canarytokens installations can update by pulling the latest Docker image, or any Docker image after `sha-097d91a`. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Radio Player.This issue affects Radio Player: from n/a through 2.0.73.
|
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in XpeedStudio Metform allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Metform: from n/a through 3.9.2. |
| Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Pixelcurve Edubin edubin.This issue affects Edubin: from n/a through 9.2.0. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Cusmin Absolutely Glamorous Custom Admin.This issue affects Absolutely Glamorous Custom Admin: from n/a through 7.2.2.
|
| The vulnerability allows a malicious low-privileged PAM user to perform server upgrade related actions. |
| Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Room 34 Creative Services, LLC ICS Calendar ics-calendar allows Absolute Path Traversal, : Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects ICS Calendar: from n/a through 10.12.0.3. |
| The URL Media Uploader plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0 via the 'url_media_uploader_url_upload' action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the latest version of vanna-ai/vanna when using DuckDB as the database. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted SQL queries that leverage DuckDB's default features, such as `read_csv`, `read_csv_auto`, `read_text`, and `read_blob`, to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, internal systems, and potentially further attacks. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Ankur Vishwakarma WP AVCL Automation Helper (formerly WPFlyLeads) allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects WP AVCL Automation Helper (formerly WPFlyLeads): from n/a through 3.4. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Envato Envato Elements allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Envato Elements: from n/a through 2.0.14. |
| The Stream plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.2 due to insufficient validation on the webhook feature. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SMA1000 appliance firmware versions 12.4.3-02676 and earlier allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause the SMA1000 server-side application to make requests to an unintended IP address. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Firsh Justified Image Grid allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Justified Image Grid: from n/a through 4.6.1. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in wpdive Nexa Blocks allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Nexa Blocks: from n/a through 1.1.0. |
| Judge0 is an open-source online code execution system. The default configuration of Judge0 leaves the service vulnerable to a sandbox escape via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This allows an attacker with sufficient access to the Judge0 API to obtain unsandboxed code execution as root on the target machine. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.13.1.
|
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in NotFound Oshine Modules. This issue affects Oshine Modules: from n/a through n/a. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ShortPixel ShortPixel Adaptive Images.This issue affects ShortPixel Adaptive Images: from n/a through 3.8.3.
|
