Filtered by vendor Foxitsoftware
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Reader
Subscriptions
Total
259 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-8844 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.6.0.25114. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of JPEG files within CovertToPDF. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in an integer overflow before writing to memory. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9102. | ||||
| CVE-2020-15638 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.2.29539. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the NodeProperties::InferReceiverMapsUnsafe method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10950. | ||||
| CVE-2020-15637 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 Low |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the SetLocalDescription method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can cause a pointer to be reused after it has been freed. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10972. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13815 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.1. It allows stack consumption via a loop of an indirect object reference. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13814 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.1. It has a use-after-free via a document that lacks a dictionary. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13810 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13809 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It allows resource consumption via long strings in the content stream. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13808 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It allows resource consumption via crafted cross-reference stream data. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13807 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It has circular reference mishandling that causes a loop. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13806 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It has a use-after-free because of JavaScript execution after a deletion or close operation. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13805 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It has brute-force attack mishandling because the CAS service lacks a limit on login failures. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13804 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It allows information disclosure of a hardcoded username and password in the DocuSign plugin. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13803 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF Mac and Foxit Reader for Mac before 4.0. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures. | ||||
| CVE-2020-12248 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| In Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.0.1, and PhantomPDF before 9.7.3, attackers can execute arbitrary code via a heap-based buffer overflow because dirty image-resource data is mishandled. | ||||
| CVE-2020-12247 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 High |
| In Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.0.1, and PhantomPDF before 9.7.3, attackers can obtain sensitive information from an out-of-bounds read because a text-string index continues to be used after splitting a string into two parts. A crash may also occur. | ||||
| CVE-2020-11493 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| In Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.0.1, and PhantomPDF before 9.7.3, attackers can obtain sensitive information about an uninitialized object because of direct transformation from PDF Object to Stream without concern for a crafted XObject. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10912 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the SetFieldValue command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9945. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10911 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the GetFieldValue command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9944. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10910 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the RotatePage command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9943. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10909 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the AddWatermark command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9942. | ||||