Filtered by vendor Arista
Subscriptions
Total
77 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-3209 | 8 Arista, Canonical, Debian and 5 more | 20 Eos, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 17 more | 2024-08-06 | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the PCNET controller in QEMU allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending a packet with TXSTATUS_STARTPACKET set and then a crafted packet with TXSTATUS_DEVICEOWNS set. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3214 | 6 Arista, Debian, Lenovo and 3 more | 20 Eos, Debian Linux, Emc Px12-400r Ivx and 17 more | 2024-08-06 | N/A |
| The pit_ioport_read in i8254.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.33 and QEMU before 2.3.1 does not distinguish between read lengths and write lengths, which might allow guest OS users to execute arbitrary code on the host OS by triggering use of an invalid index. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9012 | 1 Arista | 1 Cloudvision Portal | 2024-08-06 | N/A |
| CloudVision Portal (CVP) before 2016.1.2.1 allows remote authenticated users to gain access to the internal configuration mechanisms via the management plane, related to a request to /web/system/console/bundle. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6894 | 1 Arista | 6 Dcs-7050q, Dcs-7050q Eos Software, Dcs-7050s and 3 more | 2024-08-06 | N/A |
| Arista EOS 4.15 before 4.15.8M, 4.16 before 4.16.7M, and 4.17 before 4.17.0F on DCS-7050 series devices allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reboot) by sending crafted packets to the control plane. | ||||
| CVE-2017-18017 | 9 Arista, Canonical, Debian and 6 more | 33 Eos, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 30 more | 2024-08-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| The tcpmss_mangle_packet function in net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c in the Linux kernel before 4.11, and 4.9.x before 4.9.36, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (use-after-free and memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging the presence of xt_TCPMSS in an iptables action. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14491 | 13 Arista, Arubanetworks, Canonical and 10 more | 35 Eos, Arubaos, Ubuntu Linux and 32 more | 2024-08-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in dnsmasq before 2.78 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted DNS response. | ||||
| CVE-2018-14008 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| Arista EOS through 4.21.0F allows a crash because 802.1x authentication is mishandled. | ||||
| CVE-2018-12357 | 1 Arista | 1 Cloudvision Portal | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| Arista CloudVision Portal through 2018.1.1 has Incorrect Permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2018-5255 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| The Mlag agent in Arista EOS 4.19 before 4.19.4M and 4.20 before 4.20.2F allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (agent restart) via crafted UDP packets. | ||||
| CVE-2018-5254 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| Arista EOS before 4.20.2F allows remote BGP peers to cause a denial of service (Rib agent restart) via a malformed path attribute in an UPDATE message. | ||||
| CVE-2019-18948 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was found in Arista EOS. Specific malformed ARP packets can impact the software forwarding of VxLAN packets. This issue is found in Arista’s EOS VxLAN code, which can allow attackers to crash the VxlanSwFwd agent. This affects EOS 4.21.8M and below releases in the 4.21.x train, 4.22.3M and below releases in the 4.22.x train, 4.23.1F and below releases in the 4.23.x train, and all releases in 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.18, 4.19, 4.20 code train. | ||||
| CVE-2019-18615 | 1 Arista | 1 Cloudvision Portal | 2024-08-05 | 4.9 Medium |
| In CloudVision Portal (CVP) for all releases in the 2018.2 Train, under certain conditions, the application logs user passwords in plain text for certain API calls, potentially leading to user password exposure. This only affects CVP environments where: 1. Devices have enable mode passwords which are different from the user's login password, OR 2. There are configlet builders that use the Device class and specify username and password explicitly Application logs are not accessible or visible from the CVP GUI. Application logs can only be read by authorized users with privileged access to the VM hosting the CVP application. | ||||
| CVE-2019-18181 | 1 Arista | 1 Cloudvision Portal | 2024-08-05 | 7.8 High |
| In CloudVision Portal all releases in the 2018.1 and 2018.2 Code train allows users with read-only permissions to bypass permissions for restricted functionality via CVP API calls through the Configlet Builder modules. This vulnerability can potentially enable authenticated users with read-only access to take actions that are otherwise restricted in the GUI. | ||||
| CVE-2019-17596 | 6 Arista, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 13 Cloudvision Portal, Eos, Mos and 10 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| Go before 1.12.11 and 1.3.x before 1.13.2 can panic upon an attempt to process network traffic containing an invalid DSA public key. There are several attack scenarios, such as traffic from a client to a server that verifies client certificates. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14810 | 1 Arista | 10 7020r, 7280e, 7280r and 7 more | 2024-08-05 | 5.9 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in the implementation of the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) protocol in EOS. Under race conditions, the LDP agent can establish an LDP session with a malicious peer potentially allowing the possibility of a Denial of Service (DoS) attack on route updates and in turn potentially leading to an Out of Memory (OOM) condition that is disruptive to traffic forwarding. Affected EOS versions include: 4.22 release train: 4.22.1F and earlier releases 4.21 release train: 4.21.0F - 4.21.2.3F, 4.21.3F - 4.21.7.1M 4.20 release train: 4.20.14M and earlier releases 4.19 release train: 4.19.12M and earlier releases End of support release trains (4.18 and 4.17) | ||||
| CVE-2020-26569 | 1 Arista | 47 7010t-48, 7050cx3-32s, 7050cx3m-32s and 44 more | 2024-08-04 | 5.9 Medium |
| In EVPN VxLAN setups in Arista EOS, specific malformed packets can lead to incorrect MAC to IP bindings and as a result packets can be incorrectly forwarded across VLAN boundaries. This can result in traffic being discarded on the receiving VLAN. This affects versions: 4.21.12M and below releases in the 4.21.x train; 4.22.7M and below releases in the 4.22.x train; 4.23.5M and below releases in the 4.23.x train; 4.24.2F and below releases in the 4.24.x train. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26143 | 4 Alfa, Arista, Redhat and 1 more | 13 Awus036h, Awus036h Firmware, C-65 and 10 more | 2024-08-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 1030.36.604 for AWUS036ACH. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept fragmented plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary data frames independent of the network configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26144 | 4 Arista, Redhat, Samsung and 1 more | 37 C-100, C-100 Firmware, C-110 and 34 more | 2024-08-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung Galaxy S3 i9305 4.4.4 devices. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext A-MSDU frames as long as the first 8 bytes correspond to a valid RFC1042 (i.e., LLC/SNAP) header for EAPOL. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets independent of the network configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26147 | 5 Arista, Debian, Linux and 2 more | 15 C-65, C-65 Firmware, C-75 and 12 more | 2024-08-04 | 5.4 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel 5.8.9. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations reassemble fragments even though some of them were sent in plaintext. This vulnerability can be abused to inject packets and/or exfiltrate selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP data-confidentiality protocol is used. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26146 | 4 Arista, Redhat, Samsung and 1 more | 39 C-100, C-100 Firmware, C-110 and 36 more | 2024-08-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung Galaxy S3 i9305 4.4.4 devices. The WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations reassemble fragments with non-consecutive packet numbers. An adversary can abuse this to exfiltrate selected fragments. This vulnerability is exploitable when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP data-confidentiality protocol is used. Note that WEP is vulnerable to this attack by design. | ||||