Search
Search Results (26 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2004-1413 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Kayako eSupport 2.x allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) subcat, (2) rate, (3) questiondetails, (4) ticketkey22, (5) email22 parameters to index.php, or (6) the e-mail field of the Forgot Key feature. | ||||
| CVE-2005-4638 | 1 Kayako | 1 Supportsuite | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| index.php in Kayako SupportSuite 3.00.26 and earlier allow remote attackers to obtain the full path via (1) _a and (2) newsid parameters in the news module, (3) downloaditemid parameter in the downloads module, and (4) kbarticleid parameter in the knowledgebase module. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2461 | 1 Kayako | 1 Liveresponse | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the calendar feature in Kayako liveResponse 2.x allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) year or (2) date parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2460 | 1 Kayako | 1 Liveresponse | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Kayako liveResponse 2.x allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) username parameter or (2) name field when entering a session or sending a message. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0487 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.php for Kayako ESupport 2.3.1, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML and web script via the nav parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35913 | 1 Kayako | 1 Samourai | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| Samourai Wallet Stonewallx2 0.99.98e allows a denial of service via a P2P coinjoin. The attacker and victim must follow each other's paynym. Then, the victim must try to collaborate with the attacker for a Stonewallx2 transaction. Next, the attacker broadcasts a tx, spending the inputs used in Stonewallx2 before the victim can broadcast the collaborative transaction. The attacker does not signal opt in RBF, and uses the lowest fee rate. This would result in the victim being unable to perform Stonewallx2. (Note that the attacker could use multiple paynyms.) | ||||