Filtered by vendor Kayako
Subscriptions
Total
26 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-2912 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
| SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in Kayako eSupport 3.70.02 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the _a parameter in a downloads action. | ||||
| CVE-2010-2911 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
| SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in Kayako eSupport 3.70.02 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the newsid parameter in a viewnews action. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0460 | 1 Kayako | 2 Esupport, Supportsuite | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in staff/index.php in Kayako SupportSuite 3.60.04 and earlier allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) subject parameter and (2) contents parameter (aka body) in an insertquestion action. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | ||||
| CVE-2012-4872 | 1 Kayako | 1 Kayako Fusion | 2024-08-06 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Tickets/Submit in Kayako Fusion before 4.40.985 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via certain vectors, possibly a crafted ticket description. | ||||
| CVE-2012-3233 | 1 Kayako | 1 Fusion | 2024-08-06 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in __swift/thirdparty/PHPExcel/PHPExcel/Shared/JAMA/docs/download.php in Kayako Fusion 4.40.1148, and possibly before 4.50.1581, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the PATH_INFO. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35913 | 1 Kayako | 1 Samourai | 2024-08-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| Samourai Wallet Stonewallx2 0.99.98e allows a denial of service via a P2P coinjoin. The attacker and victim must follow each other's paynym. Then, the victim must try to collaborate with the attacker for a Stonewallx2 transaction. Next, the attacker broadcasts a tx, spending the inputs used in Stonewallx2 before the victim can broadcast the collaborative transaction. The attacker does not signal opt in RBF, and uses the lowest fee rate. This would result in the victim being unable to perform Stonewallx2. (Note that the attacker could use multiple paynyms.) | ||||