Filtered by vendor Zimbra
Subscriptions
Total
67 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-45206 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15, 9.0, and 10.0. Through the help document endpoint in webmail, an attacker can inject JavaScript or HTML code that leads to cross-site scripting (XSS). (Adding an adequate message to avoid malicious code will mitigate this issue.) | ||||
| CVE-2023-43103 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| An XSS issue was discovered in a web endpoint in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.0.4 via an unsanitized parameter. This is also fixed in 8.8.15 Patch 43 and 9.0.0 Patch 36. | ||||
| CVE-2023-43102 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.0.4. An XSS issue can be exploited to access the mailbox of an authenticated user. This is also fixed in 8.8.15 Patch 43 and 9.0.0 Patch 36. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41106 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.0.3. An attacker can gain access to a Zimbra account. This is also fixed in 9.0.0 Patch 35 and 8.8.15 Patch 42. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38750 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Zimbra | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8 before 8.8.15 Patch 41, 9 before 9.0.0 Patch 34, and 10 before 10.0.2, internal JSP and XML files can be exposed. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34193 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| File Upload vulnerability in Zimbra ZCS 8.8.15 allows an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via the ClientUploader function. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29382 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue in Zimbra Collaboration ZCS v.8.8.15 and v.9.0 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the sfdc_preauth.jsp component. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29381 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) v.8.8.15 and v.9.0 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges and obtain sensitive information via the password and 2FA parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26562 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0, a closed account (with 2FA and generated passwords) can send e-mail messages when configured for Imap/smtp. | ||||
| CVE-2022-45913 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 9.0. XSS can occur via one of attributes in webmail URLs to execute arbitrary JavaScript code, leading to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2022-45912 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 High |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. Remote code execution can occur through ClientUploader by an authenticated admin user. An authenticated admin user can upload files through the ClientUploader utility, and traverse to any other directory for remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2022-45911 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 9.0. XSS can occur on the Classic UI login page by injecting arbitrary JavaScript code in the username field. This occurs before the user logs into the system, which means that even if the attacker executes arbitrary JavaScript, they will not get any sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41351 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| In Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15, at the URL /h/calendar, one can trigger XSS by adding JavaScript code to the view parameter and changing the value of the uncheck parameter to a string (instead of default value of 10). | ||||
| CVE-2022-41350 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| In Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15, /h/search?action=voicemail&action=listen accepts a phone parameter that is vulnerable to Reflected XSS. This allows executing arbitrary JavaScript on the victim's machine. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41349 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| In Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15, the URL at /h/compose accepts an attachUrl parameter that is vulnerable to Reflected XSS. This allows executing arbitrary JavaScript on the victim's machine. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41348 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 9.0. XSS can occur via the onerror attribute of an IMG element, leading to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41347 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.x and 9.x (e.g., 8.8.15). The Sudo configuration permits the zimbra user to execute the NGINX binary as root with arbitrary parameters. As part of its intended functionality, NGINX can load a user-defined configuration file, which includes plugins in the form of .so files, which also execute as root. | ||||
| CVE-2022-37393 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Zimbra's sudo configuration permits the zimbra user to execute the zmslapd binary as root with arbitrary parameters. As part of its intended functionality, zmslapd can load a user-defined configuration file, which includes plugins in the form of .so files, which also execute as root. | ||||
| CVE-2022-37044 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| In Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15, the URL at /h/search?action accepts parameters called extra, title, and onload that are partially sanitised and lead to reflected XSS that allows executing arbitrary JavaScript on the victim's machine. | ||||
| CVE-2022-37043 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 5.7 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in the webmail component in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. When using preauth, CSRF tokens are not checked on some POST endpoints. Thus, when an authenticated user views an attacker-controlled page, a request will be sent to the application that appears to be intended. The CSRF token is omitted from the request, but the request still succeeds. | ||||