Total
468 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-50347 | 2024-11-01 | N/A | ||
| Laravel Reverb provides a real-time WebSocket communication backend for Laravel applications. Prior to 1.4.0, there is an issue where verification signatures for requests sent to Reverb's Pusher-compatible API were not being verified. This API is used in scenarios such as broadcasting a message from a backend service or for obtaining statistical information (such as number of connections) about a given channel. This issue only affects the Pusher-compatible API endpoints and not the WebSocket connections themselves. In order to exploit this vulnerability, the application ID which, should never be exposed, would need to be known by an attacker. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33768 | 1 Belkin | 2 Wemo Smart Plug Wsp080, Wemo Smart Plug Wsp080 Firmware | 2024-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| Incorrect signature verification of the firmware during the Device Firmware Update process of Belkin Wemo Smart Plug WSP080 v1.2 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted firmware file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8036 | 2024-10-30 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| ABB is aware of privately reported vulnerabilities in the product versions referenced in this CVE. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a specially crafted firmware or configuration to the system node, causing the node to stop, become inaccessible, or allowing the attacker to take control of the node. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41254 | 1 Litestream | 1 Litestream | 2024-10-29 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in litestream v0.3.13. The usage of the ssh.InsecureIgnoreHostKey() disables host key verification, possibly allowing attackers to obtain sensitive information via a man-in-the-middle attack. | ||||
| CVE-2019-5592 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios Ips Engine | 2024-10-25 | 5.9 Medium |
| Multiple padding oracle vulnerabilities (Zombie POODLE, GOLDENDOODLE, OpenSSL 0-length) in the CBC padding implementation of FortiOS IPS engine version 5.000 to 5.006, 4.000 to 4.036, 4.200 to 4.219, 3.547 and below, when configured with SSL Deep Inspection policies and with the IPS sensor enabled, may allow an attacker to decipher TLS connections going through the FortiGate via monitoring the traffic in a Man-in-the-middle position. | ||||
| CVE-2021-24020 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2024-10-25 | 7.5 High |
| A missing cryptographic step in the implementation of the hash digest algorithm in FortiMail 6.4.0 through 6.4.4, and 6.2.0 through 6.2.7 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to tamper with signed URLs by appending further data which allows bypass of signature verification. | ||||
| CVE-2021-26100 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2024-10-25 | 5.9 Medium |
| A missing cryptographic step in the Identity-Based Encryption service of FortiMail before 7.0.0 may allow an unauthenticated attacker who intercepts the encrypted messages to manipulate them in such a way that makes the tampering and the recovery of the plaintexts possible. | ||||
| CVE-2023-20135 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xr | 2024-10-23 | 5.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability in Cisco IOS XR Software image verification checks could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary code on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to a time-of-check, time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition when an install query regarding an ISO image is performed during an install operation that uses an ISO image. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by modifying an ISO image and then carrying out install requests in parallel. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on an affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2023-20236 | 1 Cisco | 53 8201, 8202, 8208 and 50 more | 2024-10-23 | 6.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the iPXE boot function of Cisco IOS XR software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install an unverified software image on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient image verification. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the boot parameters for image verification during the iPXE boot process on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to boot an unverified software image on the affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43074 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortios, Fortiproxy, Fortiswitch and 1 more | 2024-10-22 | 4.1 Medium |
| An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability [CWE-347] in FortiWeb 6.4 all versions, 6.3.16 and below, 6.2 all versions, 6.1 all versions, 6.0 all versions; FortiOS 7.0.3 and below, 6.4.8 and below, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions; FortiSwitch 7.0.3 and below, 6.4.10 and below, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions; FortiProxy 7.0.1 and below, 2.0.7 and below, 1.2 all versions, 1.1 all versions, 1.0 all versions may allow an attacker to decrypt portions of the administrative session management cookie if able to intercept the latter. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2730 | 5 Debian, Mozilla, Novell and 2 more | 10 Debian Linux, Firefox, Firefox Esr and 7 more | 2024-10-22 | N/A |
| Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.19.1, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 39.0, Firefox ESR 31.x before 31.8 and 38.x before 38.1, and other products, does not properly perform Elliptical Curve Cryptography (ECC) multiplications, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof ECDSA signatures via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2014-1568 | 5 Apple, Google, Microsoft and 2 more | 14 Mac Os X, Chrome, Chrome Os and 11 more | 2024-10-21 | N/A |
| Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.16.2.1, 3.16.x before 3.16.5, and 3.17.x before 3.17.1, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 32.0.3, Mozilla Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.8.1 and 31.x before 31.1.1, Mozilla Thunderbird before 24.8.1 and 31.x before 31.1.2, Mozilla SeaMonkey before 2.29.1, Google Chrome before 37.0.2062.124 on Windows and OS X, and Google Chrome OS before 37.0.2062.120, does not properly parse ASN.1 values in X.509 certificates, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof RSA signatures via a crafted certificate, aka a "signature malleability" issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38418 | 1 F5 | 2 Access Policy Manager Clients, Big-ip Access Policy Manager | 2024-10-17 | 7.8 High |
| The BIG-IP Edge Client Installer on macOS does not follow best practices for elevating privileges during the installation process. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21917 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 Factorytalk Services Platform | 2024-10-17 | 9.8 Critical |
| A vulnerability exists in Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk® Service Platform that allows a malicious user to obtain the service token and use it for authentication on another FTSP directory. This is due to the lack of digital signing between the FTSP service token and directory. If exploited, a malicious user could potentially retrieve user information and modify settings without any authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28796 | 1 Zscaler | 1 Client Connector | 2024-10-17 | 7.1 High |
| Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in Zscaler Client Connector on Linux allows Code Injection. This issue affects Zscaler Client Connector for Linux: before 1.3.1.6. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28804 | 1 Zscaler | 1 Client Connector | 2024-10-17 | 8.2 High |
| An Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in Zscaler Client Connector on Linux allows replacing binaries.This issue affects Linux Client Connector: before 1.4.0.105 | ||||
| CVE-2024-21491 | 1 Svix | 1 Svix | 2024-10-16 | 5.9 Medium |
| Versions of the package svix before 1.17.0 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass due to an issue in the verify function where signatures of different lengths are incorrectly compared. An attacker can bypass signature verification by providing a shorter signature that matches the beginning of the actual signature. **Note:** The attacker would need to know a victim uses the Rust library for verification,no easy way to automatically check that; and uses webhooks by a service that uses Svix, and then figure out a way to craft a malicious payload that will actually include all of the correct identifiers needed to trick the receivers to cause actual issues. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8531 | 1 Schneider-electric | 1 Data Center Expert | 2024-10-15 | 7.2 High |
| CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability exists that could compromise the Data Center Expert software when an upgrade bundle is manipulated to include arbitrary bash scripts that are executed as root. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48949 | 2 Indutny, Redhat | 6 Elliptic, Acm, Multicluster Engine and 3 more | 2024-10-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| The verify function in lib/elliptic/eddsa/index.js in the Elliptic package before 6.5.6 for Node.js omits "sig.S().gte(sig.eddsa.curve.n) || sig.S().isNeg()" validation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47943 | 2024-10-15 | N/A | ||
| The firmware upgrade function in the admin web interface of the Rittal IoT Interface & CMC III Processing Unit devices checks if the patch files are signed before executing the containing run.sh script. The signing process is kind of an HMAC with a long string as key which is hard-coded in the firmware and is freely available for download. This allows crafting malicious "signed" .patch files in order to compromise the device and execute arbitrary code. | ||||