Filtered by vendor Redhat Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openshift Subscriptions
Total 931 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2019-19354 1 Redhat 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform 2024-08-05 7.8 High
An insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in the operator-framework/hadoop as shipped in Red Hat Openshift 4. An attacker with access to the container could use this flaw to modify /etc/passwd and escalate their privileges.
CVE-2019-19355 1 Redhat 1 Openshift 2024-08-05 7 High
An insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in the openshift/ocp-release-operator-sdk. An attacker with access to the container could use this flaw to modify /etc/passwd and escalate their privileges. This CVE is specific to the openshift/ansible-operator-container as shipped in Openshift 4.
CVE-2019-19350 1 Redhat 1 Openshift 2024-08-05 7.8 High
An insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in the openshift/ansible-service-broker as shipped in Red Hat Openshift 4 and 3.11. An attacker with access to the container could use this flaw to modify /etc/passwd and escalate their privileges.
CVE-2019-19345 1 Redhat 1 Openshift 2024-08-05 7 High
A vulnerability was found in all openshift/mediawiki-apb 4.x.x versions prior to 4.3.0, where an insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in the container openshift/mediawiki-apb. An attacker with access to the container could use this flaw to modify /etc/passwd and escalate their privileges.
CVE-2019-19346 1 Redhat 1 Openshift 2024-08-05 7 High
An insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in the container openshift/mariadb-apb, affecting versions before the following 4.3.5, 4.2.21, 4.1.37, and 3.11.188-4 . An attacker with access to the container could use this flaw to modify /etc/passwd and escalate their privileges.
CVE-2019-19348 1 Redhat 1 Openshift 2024-08-05 7 High
An insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in the container openshift/apb-base, affecting versions before the following 4.3.5, 4.2.21, 4.1.37, and 3.11.188-4. An attacker with access to the container could use this flaw to modify /etc/passwd and escalate their privileges.
CVE-2019-19330 4 Canonical, Debian, Haproxy and 1 more 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Haproxy and 3 more 2024-08-05 9.8 Critical
The HTTP/2 implementation in HAProxy before 2.0.10 mishandles headers, as demonstrated by carriage return (CR, ASCII 0xd), line feed (LF, ASCII 0xa), and the zero character (NUL, ASCII 0x0), aka Intermediary Encapsulation Attacks.
CVE-2019-19352 1 Redhat 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform 2024-08-05 7.0 High
An insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in the operator-framework/presto as shipped in Red Hat Openshift 4. An attacker with access to the container could use this flaw to modify /etc/passwd and escalate their privileges.
CVE-2019-19335 1 Redhat 1 Openshift 2024-08-05 4.4 Medium
During installation of an OpenShift 4 cluster, the `openshift-install` command line tool creates an `auth` directory, with `kubeconfig` and `kubeadmin-password` files. Both files contain credentials used to authenticate to the OpenShift API server, and are incorrectly assigned word-readable permissions. ose-installer as shipped in Openshift 4.2 is vulnerable.
CVE-2019-18874 2 Psutil Project, Redhat 7 Psutil, Ansible Tower, Enterprise Linux and 4 more 2024-08-05 7.5 High
psutil (aka python-psutil) through 5.6.5 can have a double free. This occurs because of refcount mishandling within a while or for loop that converts system data into a Python object.
CVE-2019-18277 2 Haproxy, Redhat 4 Haproxy, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 1 more 2024-08-05 7.5 High
A flaw was found in HAProxy before 2.0.6. In legacy mode, messages featuring a transfer-encoding header missing the "chunked" value were not being correctly rejected. The impact was limited but if combined with the "http-reuse always" setting, it could be used to help construct an HTTP request smuggling attack against a vulnerable component employing a lenient parser that would ignore the content-length header as soon as it saw a transfer-encoding one (even if not entirely valid according to the specification).
CVE-2019-17638 2 Eclipse, Redhat 3 Jetty, Jboss Fuse, Openshift 2024-08-05 9.4 Critical
In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.4.27.v20200227 to 9.4.29.v20200521, in case of too large response headers, Jetty throws an exception to produce an HTTP 431 error. When this happens, the ByteBuffer containing the HTTP response headers is released back to the ByteBufferPool twice. Because of this double release, two threads can acquire the same ByteBuffer from the pool and while thread1 is about to use the ByteBuffer to write response1 data, thread2 fills the ByteBuffer with other data. Thread1 then proceeds to write the buffer that now contains different data. This results in client1, which issued request1 seeing data from another request or response which could contain sensitive data belonging to client2 (HTTP session ids, authentication credentials, etc.). If the Jetty version cannot be upgraded, the vulnerability can be significantly reduced by configuring a responseHeaderSize significantly larger than the requestHeaderSize (12KB responseHeaderSize and 8KB requestHeaderSize).
CVE-2019-17596 6 Arista, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more 13 Cloudvision Portal, Eos, Mos and 10 more 2024-08-05 7.5 High
Go before 1.12.11 and 1.3.x before 1.13.2 can panic upon an attempt to process network traffic containing an invalid DSA public key. There are several attack scenarios, such as traffic from a client to a server that verifies client certificates.
CVE-2019-16884 6 Canonical, Docker, Fedoraproject and 3 more 12 Ubuntu Linux, Docker, Fedora and 9 more 2024-08-05 7.5 High
runc through 1.0.0-rc8, as used in Docker through 19.03.2-ce and other products, allows AppArmor restriction bypass because libcontainer/rootfs_linux.go incorrectly checks mount targets, and thus a malicious Docker image can mount over a /proc directory.
CVE-2019-16769 2 Redhat, Verizon 3 Openshift, Service Mesh, Serialize-javascript 2024-08-05 4.2 Medium
The serialize-javascript npm package before version 2.1.1 is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS). It does not properly mitigate against unsafe characters in serialized regular expressions. This vulnerability is not affected on Node.js environment since Node.js's implementation of RegExp.prototype.toString() backslash-escapes all forward slashes in regular expressions. If serialized data of regular expression objects are used in an environment other than Node.js, it is affected by this vulnerability.
CVE-2019-16541 2 Jenkins, Redhat 2 Jira, Openshift 2024-08-05 9.9 Critical
Jenkins JIRA Plugin 3.0.10 and earlier does not declare the correct (folder) scope for per-folder Jira site definitions, allowing users to select and use credentials with System scope.
CVE-2019-16538 2 Jenkins, Redhat 2 Script Security, Openshift 2024-08-05 8.8 High
A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.67 and earlier related to the handling of default parameter expressions in closures allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts.
CVE-2019-16276 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Golang and 3 more 11 Debian Linux, Fedora, Go and 8 more 2024-08-05 7.5 High
Go before 1.12.10 and 1.13.x before 1.13.1 allow HTTP Request Smuggling.
CVE-2019-15718 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Systemd Project 15 Fedora, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 12 more 2024-08-05 4.4 Medium
In systemd 240, bus_open_system_watch_bind_with_description in shared/bus-util.c (as used by systemd-resolved to connect to the system D-Bus instance), calls sd_bus_set_trusted, which disables access controls for incoming D-Bus messages. An unprivileged user can exploit this by executing D-Bus methods that should be restricted to privileged users, in order to change the system's DNS resolver settings.
CVE-2019-14891 3 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes, Redhat 4 Fedora, Cri-o, Openshift and 1 more 2024-08-05 5.0 Medium
A flaw was found in cri-o, as a result of all pod-related processes being placed in the same memory cgroup. This can result in container management (conmon) processes being killed if a workload process triggers an out-of-memory (OOM) condition for the cgroup. An attacker could abuse this flaw to get host network access on an cri-o host.