wireshark: DoS (infinite loop) in the ICMPv6 dissector (wnpa-sec-2012-40)

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6058. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6058. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6058 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was assigned to an issue that is not within the scope of CVE. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-7575, CVE-2019-7577. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-7575 and/or CVE-2019-7577. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-7575 and/or CVE-2019-7577 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4092. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2005-4092. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-4092 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-5688. Reason: This issue has been MERGED with CVE-2013-5688 in accordance with CVE content decisions, because it is the same type of vulnerability affecting the same versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-5688 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2004. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none

wireshark: DoS (crash) in the ISAKMP dissector (wnpa-sec-2012-35)

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6059. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6059. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6059 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-5079. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-5079. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-5079 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3265. Reason: this candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3265; after initial reservation, the requester discovered that they had the same cause. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3265 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0796, CVE-2009-1265. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but a typo caused it to be associated with a different issue. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2009-0796 and CVE-2009-1265 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1969. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-1969. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1969 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6339. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6339. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6339 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6120. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6120. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6120 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6271. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-6271. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-6271 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4670, CVE-2010-4671. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4670 and CVE-2010-4671. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4670 and/or CVE-2010-4671 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: A public posting on 20130831 referenced this ID for a specific issue, but that issue had not been assigned this ID by any CNA. Notes: The posting will later have IDs assigned in accordance with CVE content decisions