DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4504. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-4504. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-4504 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-2667. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-2667. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-2667 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

wireshark: DoS (infinite loop) in the 3GPP2 A11 dissector (wnpa-sec-2012-39)

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6055. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6055. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6055 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: A public posting on 20130831 referenced this ID for a specific issue, but that issue had not been assigned this ID by any CNA. Notes: The posting will later have IDs assigned in accordance with CVE content decisions

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-5100. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-5100. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-5100 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none

avahi: daemon infinite loop triggered by an empty UDP packet (CVE-2010-2244 fix regression)

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1002. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2011-1002. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1002 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9456. Reason: This candidate is not authorized for use because it is part of the 2014 CVE-ID ID-Syntax protection block, which protects against accidental truncation of CVE IDs with sequence numbers containing more than 4 digits. See references. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-9456 instead of this candidate

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5956. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5956. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5956 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6114. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6114. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6114 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-2607. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-2607. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-2607 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-2942. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-2942. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-2942 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

wireshark: DoS (infinite loop) in the RTCP dissector (wnpa-sec-2012-38)

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6062. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6062. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6062 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-19131. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-19131. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-19131 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5416. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5416. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5416 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2692. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2692. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2692 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9848. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9848. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9848 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2615. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-2615. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-2615 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-5103. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-5103. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-5103 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage