DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-2339. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-2339. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-2339 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
Search vulnerabilities
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-2341. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-2341. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-2341 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-11104. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-11104. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-11104 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-10976. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-10976. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-10976 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0882. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0882. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0882 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9862. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3899. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3899. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3899 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-3600. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-3600. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-3600 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-2726. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-2726. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-2726 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: A public posting on 20130831 referenced this ID for a specific issue, but that issue had not been assigned this ID by any CNA. Notes: The posting will later have IDs assigned in accordance with CVE content decisions
wireshark: DoS (infinite loop) in the EIGRP dissector (wnpa-sec-2012-34)
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6057. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6057. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6057 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1564. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1564. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1564 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: A public posting on 20130831 referenced this ID for a specific issue, but that issue had not been assigned this ID by any CNA. Notes: The posting will later have IDs assigned in accordance with CVE content decisions
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4062. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-4062. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-4062 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-11366. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-11366. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-11366 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9861. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none