DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-2010-0788 (ncpfs), and CVE-2010-0789 (FUSE) to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9865. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9865. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9865 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3870. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3870. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3870 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0985. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0985. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0985 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-1000307. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-1000307. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-1000307 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

wireshark: DoS (infinite loop) in the USB dissector (wnpa-sec-2012-31)

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6053. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6053. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6053 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-0722. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-0722. A year-transition issue caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-0722 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-11097. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-11097. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-11097 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a new security issue. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-5880. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-5880. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-5880 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-9091. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-9091. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-9091 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none

expat: external entity expansion

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.

wireshark: DoS (infinite loop) in the WTP dissector (wnpa-sec-2012-37)

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6061. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6061. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6061 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1869. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-1869. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1869 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was assigned in 2005 to an issue that would not be published until 2006, so new identifiers were assigned. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0017. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0017. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0017 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage