DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-2804. Reason: This record is a duplicate of CVE-2023-2804. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-2804 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
Search vulnerabilities
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE request originates from private repository
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it's a duplicate of CVE-2023-39167.
DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
This CVE ID was unused by the CNA.
This CVE ID was unused by the CNA.
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-6136. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-20nn-nnnn. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-6136 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
dom4j: XML External Entity on SAXReader
DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
binutils: Excessive debug section size can cause excessive memory consumption in bfd's dwarf2.c read_section()
Non Security Issue. See the binutils security policy for more details, https://sourceware.org/cgit/binutils-gdb/tree/binutils/SECURITY.txt
Confirm reference is not public.
appears to be a duplicate of CVE-2023-40206
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.