DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-22036. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-22036. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-22036 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-22035. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-22035. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-22035 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-22028. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-22028. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-22028 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-22025. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-22025. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-22025 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-22030. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-22030. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-22030 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-14834. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-14834. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-14834 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: Red Hat Product Security does not consider this as a security flaw. Password changes aren't expected to invalidate existing sessions. Though this is how Kerberos behaves: incrementing kvno will not invalidate any existing service tickets. This is not a concern because the lifetime on service tickets should be set appropriately (initially only a global, now also more finely configurable with the kdcpolicy plugin). This belief is reinforced by our use of mod_session: existing sessions there aren't terminated, but instead wait for expiration

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a vulnerability. Notes: The fix resolved an issue when MACsec replay-protect was enabled and the replay-protect-window value was set to zero, Junos OS was incorrectly configuring the value to MAX_WINDOW size. Hence this is not a vulnerability and this CVE ID assignment has been withdrawn

exiv2: integer buffer overflow in getUShort fucntion leads to DoS

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-13110 Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2019-13110. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-13110 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none