DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2645, CVE-2014-2644. Reason: this ID was intended for one issue, but was mapped to two issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2013-2645 and CVE-2014-2644 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This CVE has been rejected as it was incorrectly assigned. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2069. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-2069. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-2069 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2561. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-2561. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-2561 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1806. Reason: This issue was MERGED into CVE-2013-1806 in accordance with CVE content decisions, because it is the same type of vulnerability and affects the same versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1806 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2013. Notes: none

python: multiple unbound readline() DoS flaws in python stdlib

Various versions of Python do not properly restrict readline calls, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a long string, related to (1) httplib - fixed in 2.7.4, 2.6.9, and 3.3.3; (2) ftplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (3) imaplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (4) nntplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (5) poplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; and (6) smtplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, not yet fixed in 3.3.x. NOTE: this was REJECTed because it is incompatible with CNT1 "Independently Fixable" in the CVE Counting Decisions

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2013. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none