DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5283. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5282. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5282. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5282 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5281. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5281. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5281 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5280. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5280. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5280 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5279. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5279. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5279 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1171. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1171. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1171 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3387. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3387. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3387 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4880. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4880. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4880 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4568. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4568. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4568 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

Infinite loop in wireshark's DNP3 dissector

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6113. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6113. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6113 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4575. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4575. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4575 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4168. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4168. It was inadvertently used in a vendor advisory when the "2006" year was intended. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4168 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-1205. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-1205. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-1205 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

The MS-RPC functionality in smbd in Samba 3 on SUSE Linux before 20070720 does not include "one character in the shell escape handling." NOTE: this issue was originally characterized as a shell metacharacter issue due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-2447, which was interpreted by CVE to be security relevant. However, SUSE and Red Hat have disputed the problem, stating that the only impact is that scripts will not be executed if they have a "c" in their name, but even this limitation might not exist. This does not have security implications, so should not be included in CVE

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0011. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0011. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0011 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0447. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0447. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0447 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage